The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Fault behavior and characteristic earthquakes: Examples from the Wasatch and San Andreas Fault Zones
Abstract
Paleoseismological data for the Wasatch and San Andreas fault zones have led to the formulation of the characteristic earthquake model, which postulates that individual faults and fault segments tend to generate essentially same size or characteristic earthquakes having a relatively narrow range of magnitudes near the maximum. Analysis of scarp‐derived colluvium in trench exposures across the Wasatch fault provides estimates of the timing and displacement associated with individual surface faulting earthquakes. At all of the sites studied, the displacement per event has been consistently large; measured values range from 1.6 to 2.6 m, and the average is about 2 m. On the basis of variability in the timing of individual events as well as changes in scarp morphology and fault geometry, six major segments are recognized along the Wasatch fault. On the basis of the most likely number of surface faulting events (18) that have occurred on segments of the Wasatch fault zone during the past 8000 years, an average recurrence interval of 400–666 years with a preferred average of 444 years is calculated for the entire zone. Geologic data on the distribution of slip associated with prehistoric earthquakes and slip rates along the south‐central segment of the San Andreas fault suggest that the M 8 1857 earthquake is a characteristic earthquake for this segment. Comparisons of earthquake recurrence relationships on both the Wasatch and San Andreas faults based on historical seismicity data and geologic data show that a linear (constant b value) extrapolation of the cumulative recurrence curve from the smaller magnitudes leads to gross underestimates of the frequency of occurrence of the large or characteristic earthquakes. Only by assuming a low b value in the moderate magnitude range can the seismicity data on small earthquakes be reconciled with geologic data on large earthquakes. The characteristic earthquake appears to be a fundamental aspect of the behavior of the Wasatch and San Andreas faults and may apply to many other faults as well.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Friedrich, A. M., Wernicke, B. P., Niemi, N. A., Bennett, R. A., & Davis, J. L. (2003) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth · doi:10.1029/2001jb000682 · Cited by 323
A new paradigm for large earthquakes in stable continental plate interiors
Calais, E., Camelbeeck, T., Stein, S., Liu, M., & Craig, T. J. (2016) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1002/2016gl070815 · Cited by 236
Geologic implications of great interplate earthquakes along the Aleutian Arc
Ryan, H. F., & Scholl, D. W. (1993) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth · doi:10.1029/93jb02451 · Cited by 49
Chaimov (1992) · doi:10.1130/0016-7606(1992)104
Metadata
- Authors
- Schwartz, D. P., & Coppersmith, K. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1984-07-10
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- B7
- Pages
- 5681-5698
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2079238116
- Cited by
- 1,560
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fault behavior and characteristic earthquakes: Examples from the Wasatch and San Andreas Fault Zones. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/jb089ib07p05681
- The paper
- Schwartz, D. P., & Coppersmith, K. J. (1984). Fault behavior and characteristic earthquakes: Examples from the Wasatch and San Andreas Fault Zones. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth. https://doi.org/10.1029/jb089ib07p05681
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.