The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Intraplate extensional tectonics of the Eastern basin‐Range: Inferences on structural style from seismic reflection data, regional tectonics, and thermal‐mechanical models of brittle‐ductile deformation
Abstract
The general lack of a correlation between earthquakes and surface faulting in the interior of the western U.S. cordillera has motivated our efforts to evaluate the geometry, structural style, and mechanism of normal faulting characteristic of this region of intraplate extension. To address the problem, we have interpreted over 1500 km of seismic reflection data and constructed detailed cross sections of the upper crust. Rheological models of the continental crust were calculated to examine the possibility of shallow, quasi‐plastic flow and its influence on faulting in the eastern Basin‐Range, the western Colorado Plateau, and the Middle Rocky Mountains. Our data and interpretations have revealed the following styles of Cenozoic deformation: (1) steep‐ to low‐angle dip, normal faulting along the Wasatch fault, (2) low‐angle dip and listric normal faulting possibly associated with movement on preexisting thrusts, (3) the occurrence of asymmetric, mostly eastward tilted Tertiary basins that are bounded by low‐ to moderate‐dipping planar and listric faults, and (4) at least three vertically stacked, en echelon low‐angle reflections in the mid to upper crust that dip gently westward from ∼3 km beneath the Wasatch Plateau to over ∼15 km at the Utah‐Nevada border; these reflections are interpreted as normal detachment faults. The structural style of the pervasive low‐ to moderate‐angle dipping faults cannot be easily reconciled with classic brittle failure theory, but the interpreted termination of normal faults at or above the deeper low‐angle reflections suggests the presence of shallow zones of ductile deformation that may have accommodated slip. An important observation, based on interpretations of seismic reflection profiles, is that normal fault zones dip more gently in the subsurface than their associated scarps in unconsolidated surficial deposits. Segment boundaries of the Wasatch fault zone apparently coincide with the positions of east trending displacement transfer structures in thrust sheets and the position of the Precambrian Uinta aulacogen, suggesting that preexisting crustal structure partly controls the geometry of extension. To examine the influence of ductile deformation, quasi‐plastic flow was modeled for appropriate geotherms of the Basin‐Range and Colorado Plateau crusts. These models provide constraints on the depth to the frictional/quasi‐plastic transition that occurs as shallow as ∼8 km in the eastern Basin‐Range. This depth also corresponds to the approximate depth above which most accurately determined earthquake foci for small earthquakes (M<5.5) occur and suggests the presence of a low shearing strength layer in which low‐angle faulting may be accommodated. Larger magnitude earthquakes (M>5.5) appear to nucleate at 10–15 km in or near the brittle/ductile transition. The rheological modeling suggests that a thermally deforming continental lithosphere plays an important role in the evolution of this extending intraplate region. Large‐scale low‐angle reflections may represent decollements and normal faults at the top of upper crustal zones of reduced shearing strength and higher ductility.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Rheology of the lithosphere: Selected topics
Kirby, S. H., & Kronenberg, A. K. (1987) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1029/rg025i006p01219 · Cited by 695
Geochemistry and Dynamics of the Yellowstone National Park Hydrothermal System
Fournier, R. O. (1989) · Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences · doi:10.1146/annurev.ea.17.050189.000305 · Cited by 435
Continental and oceanic core complexes
Whitney, D. L., Teyssier, C., Rey, P., & Buck, W. R. (2013) · Geological Society of America Bulletin · doi:10.1130/b30754.1 · Cited by 379
Friedrich, A. M., Wernicke, B. P., Niemi, N. A., Bennett, R. A., & Davis, J. L. (2003) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth · doi:10.1029/2001jb000682 · Cited by 323
Lamontagne, M., & Ranalli, G. (1996) · Tectonophysics · doi:10.1016/0040-1951(95)00120-4 · Cited by 57
Metadata
- Authors
- Smith, R. B., & Bruhn, R. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1984-07-10
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- B7
- Pages
- 5733-5762
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1987125108
- Cited by
- 396
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 22.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intraplate extensional tectonics of the Eastern basin‐Range: Inferences on structural style from seismic reflection data, regional tectonics, and thermal‐mechanical models of brittle‐ductile deformation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/jb089ib07p05733
- The paper
- Smith, R. B., & Bruhn, R. L. (1984). Intraplate extensional tectonics of the Eastern basin‐Range: Inferences on structural style from seismic reflection data, regional tectonics, and thermal‐mechanical models of brittle‐ductile deformation. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth. https://doi.org/10.1029/jb089ib07p05733
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.