The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Elastic stress and deformation near a finite spherical magma body: Resolution of the point source paradox
Abstract
Approximate solutions are obtained for the stress and displacement fields due to a pressurized spherical cavity in an elastic half‐space. The solutions take the form of series expansions in powers of ε = a/d, where a is the cavity radius and d is the depth. The leading‐order term in the expression for the surface uplift, which arises at O(ε 3), recovers the well‐known result of Mogi for the response to a point dilatation. The first higher‐order correction accounts for a cavity of finite size and thus offers the possibility of fitting leveling data for not only the depth but also the radius and pressure increment. However, this correction is of O(ε 6) and, consequently, is weak. The result provides a formal explanation for the success of the point dilatation model in representing uplift data even when it is known independently that ε is not small. The higher‐order correction causes the surface uplift to fall off more rapidly in the radial direction, implying that a fit of the point source solution tends to underestimate the depth d. In contrast to the surface displacement, the stress field near the cavity is affected profoundly by the proximity of the free surface. Three higher‐order corrections to the stress field are obtained, which result in a uniformly valid approximation to O(ε 5). The hoop stress at the cavity exhibits a tensile maximum at the circle of tangency with a cone with its apex at the free surface. This result appears to be consistent with the locus of fractures radiating outward from the magma body inferred by seismic methods in Long Valley, California.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mogi, K. (1958) · Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) · doi:10.15083/0000033924 · Cited by 1,350
Davis, P. M. (1986) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth · doi:10.1029/jb091ib07p07429 · Cited by 219
Cited by
Fialko, Y., Khazan, Y., & Simons, M. (2001) · Geophysical Journal International · doi:10.1046/j.1365-246x.2001.00452.x · Cited by 334
Emplacement and arrest of sheets and dykes in central volcanoes
Gudmundsson, A. (2002) · Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research · doi:10.1016/s0377-0273(02)00226-3 · Cited by 272
Injection-induced surface deformation and seismicity at the Hellisheidi geothermal field, Iceland
Juncu, D., Árnadóttir, T., Geirsson, H., Guðmundsson, G. B., Lund, B., Gunnarsson, G., Hooper, A., Hreinsdóttir, S., & Michalczewska, K. (2020) · Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research · doi:10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2018.03.019 · Cited by 62
Metadata
- Authors
- McTigue, D. F.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1987-11-10
- Volume
- 92
- Issue
- B12
- Pages
- 12931-12940
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2012657154
- Cited by
- 454
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Elastic stress and deformation near a finite spherical magma body: Resolution of the point source paradox. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/jb092ib12p12931
- The paper
- McTigue, D. F. (1987). Elastic stress and deformation near a finite spherical magma body: Resolution of the point source paradox. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth. https://doi.org/10.1029/jb092ib12p12931
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.