The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Dynamically supported geoid highs over hotspots: Observation and theory
Open accessAbstract
Hotspots are associated with long‐wavelength geoid highs, an association that is even stronger when the geoid highs associated with subduction zones are removed. We quantify these associations by expanding the hotspot distribution in spherical harmonics and calculating correlation coefficients as a function of harmonic degree. The hotspot distribution spectrum is nearly white, except for peaks at degrees 2 and 6. It is correlated positively with the slab residual geoid for degrees 2–6, with low seismic velocity in the lower mantle at degree 2, and with low seismic velocity in the upper mantle at degree 6. We test fluid mechanical models for hotspots, including lithospheric delamination and hot plumes, by calculating their predicted dynamic geoid responses and comparing them to the observations. These models include the effects of temperature dependent rheology. Our preferred hotspot model, based on observations of the geoid and seismic tomography, has plumes preferentially occurring in regions of large‐scale background temperature highs in a mantle which has a substantial viscosity increase with depth, although other models are possible. Alternatively, strong plumes in the lower mantle may neck down and attenuate in the upper mantle due to changes in plume viscosity. The major low‐density anomalies causing the geoid highs associated with plumes appear to be in the lower mantle. We hypothesize that cold lower mantle underlying the complementary geoid lows is due to deeply subducted oceanic lithosphere and that hotspot plumes tend to be excluded from these cold regions of the mantle.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Hotspots and mantle plumes: Some phenomenology
Sleep, N. H. (1990) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth · doi:10.1029/jb095ib05p06715 · Cited by 1,119
Self-citationComplex Shear Wave Velocity Structure Imaged Beneath Africa and Iceland
Ritsema, J., Heijst, H. J. V., & Woodhouse, J. H. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.286.5446.1925 · Cited by 907
Global tomographic images of mantle plumes and subducting slabs: insight into deep Earth dynamics
Zhao, D. (2004) · Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors · doi:10.1016/j.pepi.2003.07.032 · Cited by 687
Zhong, S., Zuber, M. T., Moresi, L., & Gurnis, M. (2000) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth · doi:10.1029/2000jb900003 · Cited by 640
Large-scale mantle convection and the history of subduction
Richards, M. A., & Engebretson, D. C. (1992) · Nature · doi:10.1038/355437a0 · Cited by 324
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Richards, M. A., Hager, B. H., & Sleep, N. H.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1988-07-10
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- B7
- Pages
- 7690-7708
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2131114320
- Cited by
- 239
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dynamically supported geoid highs over hotspots: Observation and theory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/jb093ib07p07690
- The paper
- Richards, M. A., Hager, B. H., & Sleep, N. H. (1988). Dynamically supported geoid highs over hotspots: Observation and theory. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth. https://doi.org/10.1029/jb093ib07p07690
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.