The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Evidence for a new geomagnetic reversal from Lava flows in Idaho: Discussion of short polarity reversals in the Brunhes and late Matuyama polarity chrons
Abstract
K‐Ar ages and paleomagnetic data for basalt samples from a new core hole (site E) at the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory (INEL) indicate that the age of the reversed polarity event recorded in Snake River Plain lavas is older than 465±50 ka (1000 years before present) reported previously by Champion et al. (1981). Nine basalt flows, eight with normal polarity and one with reversed polarity, were recognized in the site E core hole. The flows above and below the reversed flow have ages of 491±80 ka and 580±93 ka, respectively. The inclination of the paleomagnetic field direction of the reversed flow at site E agrees with the inclination of reversed flows elsewhere at INEL which have an age of 565±14 ka. These reversed flows were previously thought to be correlative with the Emperor event. We suggest that this polarity event is an older event which we name the Big Lost Reversed Polarity Subchronozone and Subchron. A review of data documenting short reversal records from volcanic and sedimentary rocks shows that there is evidence for eight polarity subchrons in the Brunhes and two besides the Jaramillo in the late Matuyama. These 10 short subchrons begin to indicate the many short events that Cox (1968) hypothesized must exist if polarity interval lengths have a Poisson distribution. These events are true subchrons, not excursions, and may or may not have low associated paleointensities, although low field strengths might explain why the reversal process aborts. The mean sustained polarity interval length since late Matuyama Chron time is 90,000 years. The similarity of this number with the 10 5‐year period of the Earth's orbital eccentricity suggests anew that linkage between geomagnetic, paleoclimatic, and possible underlying Earth orbital parameters should be evaluated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The revolution that wasn't: a new interpretation of the origin of modern human behavior
Mcbrearty, S., & Brooks, A. S. (2000) · Journal of Human Evolution · doi:10.1006/jhev.2000.0435 · Cited by 2,718
A new geomagnetic polarity time scale for the Late Cretaceous and Cenozoic
Cande, S. C., & Kent, D. V. (1992) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth · doi:10.1029/92jb01202 · Cited by 1,509
Global changes in intensity of the Earth's magnetic field during the past 800 kyr
Guyodo, Y., & Valet, J.-P. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/20420 · Cited by 605
Geomagnetic field intensity and reversals during the past four million years
Valet, J.-P., & Meynadier, L. (1993) · Nature · doi:10.1038/366234a0 · Cited by 405
RECENT GEODYNAMO SIMULATIONS AND OBSERVATIONS OF THE GEOMAGNETIC FIELD
Kono, M., & Roberts, P. H. (2002) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1029/2000rg000102 · Cited by 253
Metadata
- Authors
- Champion, D. E., Lanphere, M. A., & Kuntz, M. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1988-10-10
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- B10
- Pages
- 11667-11680
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1977003666
- Cited by
- 255
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evidence for a new geomagnetic reversal from Lava flows in Idaho: Discussion of short polarity reversals in the Brunhes and late Matuyama polarity chrons. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/jb093ib10p11667
- The paper
- Champion, D. E., Lanphere, M. A., & Kuntz, M. A. (1988). Evidence for a new geomagnetic reversal from Lava flows in Idaho: Discussion of short polarity reversals in the Brunhes and late Matuyama polarity chrons. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth. https://doi.org/10.1029/jb093ib10p11667
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.