The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Global Positioning System Network analysis with phase ambiguity resolution applied to crustal deformation studies in California
Abstract
A 5‐year campaign is in progress in central and southern California to monitor tectonic motions using observations of the Global Positioning System (GPS) satellites. Evidence from geological and space‐geodetic data indicates that significant horizontal deformations of order 10 mm/yr are occurring west of the San Andreas fault along the California margin. We demonstrate, using data from initial epoch measurements in January 1987, that the goal of measuring horizontal deformations with an accuracy of 5 mm/yr over the duration of the campaign should be readily achievable. The GPS network was designed to span a wide range of baseline lengths within California and across North America to aid in phase ambiguity resolution, an important factor in achieving highest‐accuracy baseline determinations. We present an efficient algorithm for multisession network analysis of GPS data with simultaneous orbit determination and ambiguity resolution. Using this algorithm with the California data, we demonstrate the improvement obtained in station position and satellite orbit estimation when the phase ambiguities are resolved. We demonstrate several millimeters +1 part in 10 8 short‐term repeatability over five single‐session (daily) analyses for horizontal baseline components and length and several tens of millimeters for the vertical. Comparison with the independently determined very long baseline interferometry baseline between Mojave and Owens Valley suggests that the accuracy is at the same level as the repeatability. We show that simultaneous multisession analyses with ambiguity resolution improve the baseline and satellite orbit estimates compared to the single‐session analyses. With the single‐session analyses we were able to resolve all phase ambiguities on baselines within California. With the multisession analyses we were able to resolve the phase ambiguities for most of the network, over regional and continental scales.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ge, M., Gendt, G., Rothacher, M., Shi, C., & Liu, J. (2008) · Journal of Geodesy · doi:10.1007/s00190-007-0187-4 · Cited by 1,085
An Automatic Editing Algorithm for GPS data
Blewitt, G. (1990) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/gl017i003p00199 · Cited by 829
Metadata
- Authors
- Dong, D., & Bock, Y.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1989-04-10
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- B4
- Pages
- 3949-3966
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1984984876
- Cited by
- 466
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 82.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Global Positioning System Network analysis with phase ambiguity resolution applied to crustal deformation studies in California. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/jb094ib04p03949
- The paper
- Dong, D., & Bock, Y. (1989). Global Positioning System Network analysis with phase ambiguity resolution applied to crustal deformation studies in California. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth. https://doi.org/10.1029/jb094ib04p03949
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.