Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 466

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Global Positioning System Network analysis with phase ambiguity resolution applied to crustal deformation studies in California

Dong, Da‐Nan, Bock, Yehuda·1989·Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth

Abstract

A 5‐year campaign is in progress in central and southern California to monitor tectonic motions using observations of the Global Positioning System (GPS) satellites. Evidence from geological and space‐geodetic data indicates that significant horizontal deformations of order 10 mm/yr are occurring west of the San Andreas fault along the California margin. We demonstrate, using data from initial epoch measurements in January 1987, that the goal of measuring horizontal deformations with an accuracy of 5 mm/yr over the duration of the campaign should be readily achievable. The GPS network was designed to span a wide range of baseline lengths within California and across North America to aid in phase ambiguity resolution, an important factor in achieving highest‐accuracy baseline determinations. We present an efficient algorithm for multisession network analysis of GPS data with simultaneous orbit determination and ambiguity resolution. Using this algorithm with the California data, we demonstrate the improvement obtained in station position and satellite orbit estimation when the phase ambiguities are resolved. We demonstrate several millimeters +1 part in 10 8 short‐term repeatability over five single‐session (daily) analyses for horizontal baseline components and length and several tens of millimeters for the vertical. Comparison with the independently determined very long baseline interferometry baseline between Mojave and Owens Valley suggests that the accuracy is at the same level as the repeatability. We show that simultaneous multisession analyses with ambiguity resolution improve the baseline and satellite orbit estimates compared to the single‐session analyses. With the single‐session analyses we were able to resolve all phase ambiguities on baselines within California. With the multisession analyses we were able to resolve the phase ambiguities for most of the network, over regional and continental scales.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/jb094ib04p03949

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 466

Metadata

Authors
Dong, D., & Bock, Y.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
Published
1989-04-10
Volume
94
Issue
B4
Pages
3949-3966
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1984984876
Cited by
466
References
0
FWCI
82.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Global Positioning System Network analysis with phase ambiguity resolution applied to crustal deformation studies in California. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/jb094ib04p03949
The paper
Dong, D., & Bock, Y. (1989). Global Positioning System Network analysis with phase ambiguity resolution applied to crustal deformation studies in California. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth. https://doi.org/10.1029/jb094ib04p03949

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.