The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Frictional behavior and constitutive modeling of simulated fault gouge
Abstract
This paper presents an investigation of the factional properties and stability of frictional sliding for simulated fault gouge. In these experiments we sheared gouge layers (quartz sand) under saturated drained conditions and at constant normal stress (50–190 MPa) between either rough steel surfaces or Westerly granite surfaces in a triaxial apparatus. Surface roughness (60 to 320 grit) and gouge layer thickness (0–4.0 mm) were varied in the experiments with granite samples. Porosity ϕ was monitored continuously during shear. Our measurements indicate that granular gouge exhibits strain hardening and net compaction for shear strains γ less than 0.5–1.0. For γ > 0.5–1.0, sliding occurs at approximately constant shear stress and net compaction from one load/unload cycle to the next ceases. Dilatancy occurs at 1/3 to 1/2 the shear stress required for sliding and d2 ϕ/d γ 2 becomes negative at about the peak stress in a given loading cycle, indicating the onset of shear localization. Oblique shear bands appear in the layers at γ = 1.3–1.5. Experiments with an initial gouge layer exhibit velocity strengthening (the coefficient of friction increases with slip velocity), and initially bare granite surfaces exhibit velocity weakening. The magnitude of velocity strengthening varies inversely with normal stress and directly with gouge thickness and surface roughness. In the gouge experiments the dilatancy rate d ϕ/d γ also varies with slip rate. Using a simple energy balance to relate volume change and frictional resistance, we find quantitative agreement between the measured change in dilatancy rate and friction following changes in slip rate. This indicates that velocity strengthening within granular gouge is the result of dilatancy. The slip rate dependence of d ϕ/d γ increases with gouge thickness and surface roughness, in agreement with the friction data. Our data therefore suggest that slip within unconsolidated granular material, such as some natural fault gouges, is inherently stable. The results thus provide an explanation for (1) the tendency of gouge accumulation to stabilize slip in laboratory samples, and (2) the tendency for aseismic slip within shallow (< 3–5 km) unconsolidated fault gouge and within unconsolidated sediments such as shallow alluvium and accretionary prisms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Saffer, D. M., & Marone, C. (2003) · Earth and Planetary Science Letters · doi:10.1016/s0012-821x(03)00424-2 · Cited by 586
Self-citationFrictional properties of shale reservoir rocks
Kohli, A. H., & Zoback, M. D. (2013) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth · doi:10.1002/jgrb.50346 · Cited by 270
Tackley, P. J. (2000) · Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems · doi:10.1029/2000gc000043 · Cited by 229
Metadata
- Authors
- Marone, C., Raleigh, C. B., & Scholz, C. H.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1990-05-10
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- B5
- Pages
- 7007-7025
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2094152073
- Cited by
- 630
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Frictional behavior and constitutive modeling of simulated fault gouge. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/jb095ib05p07007
- The paper
- Marone, C., Raleigh, C. B., & Scholz, C. H. (1990). Frictional behavior and constitutive modeling of simulated fault gouge. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth. https://doi.org/10.1029/jb095ib05p07007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.