The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An assessment of the meteoritic contribution to the Martian soil
Open accessAbstract
The addition of meteoritic material to the Mars soils should perturb their chemical compositions, as has been detected for soils on the Moon [Anders et al., 1973] and sediments on Earth [Kyte and Wasson, 1986]. Using the measured mass influx at Earth and estimates of the Mars/Earth flux ratio, we estimate the continuous, planet‐wide meteoritic mass influx on Mars to be between 2700 and 59,000 t/yr. If distributed uniformly into a soil with a mean planetary production rate of 1 m/b.y., consistent with radar estimates of the soil depth overlaying a bouldered terrain in the Tharsis region [Christensen, 1986], our estimated mass influx would produce a meteoritic concentration in the Mars soil ranging from 2 to 29% by mass. Analysis of the Viking X ray fluorescence data indicates that the Mars soil composition is inconsistent with typical basaltic rock fragments but can be fit by a mixture of 60% basaltic rock fragments and 40% meteoritic material [Clark and Baird, 1979]. The meteoritic influx we calculate is sufficient to provide most or all of the material required by the Clark and Baird [1979] model. Particles in the mass range from 10−7 to 10−3 g, about 60–200 μm in diameter, contribute 80% of the total mass flux of meteoritic material in the 10−13 to 10 6 g mass range at Earth [Hughes, 1978]. On Earth atmospheric entry all but the smallest particles (generally ≤ 50 μm in diameter) in the 10−7 to 10−3 g mass range are heated sufficiently to melt or vaporize. Mars, because of its lower escape velocity and larger atmospheric scale height, is a much more favorable site for unmelted survival of micrometeorites on atmospheric deceleration. We calculate that a significant fraction of particles throughout the 60–1200 μm diameter range will survive Mars atmospheric entry unmelted. Thus returned Mars soils may offer a resource for sampling micrometeorites in a size range which is not collectable in unaltered form at Earth.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Is the Martian lithosphere sulfur rich?
Clark, B. C., & Baird, A. K. (1979) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth · doi:10.1029/jb084ib14p08395 · Cited by 117
Cited by
An integrated view of the chemistry and mineralogy of martian soils
Yen, A. S., Gellert, R., Schröder, C., Morris, R. V., Bell, J. F., Knudson, A. T., Clark, B. C., Ming, D. W., Crisp, J. A., Arvidson, R. E., et al. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03637 · Cited by 422
Heating and thermal transformation of micrometeoroids entering the Earth's atmosphere
Love, S. (1991) · Icarus · doi:10.1016/0019-1035(91)90085-8 · Cited by 417
The Search for Chiral Asymmetry as a Potential Biosignature in our Solar System
Glavin, D. P., Burton, A. S., Elsila, J. E., Aponte, J. C., & Dworkin, J. P. (2020) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00474 · Cited by 293
Mineralogy and evolution of the surface of Mars: A review
Chevrier, V., & Mathé, P. E. (2007) · Planetary and Space Science · doi:10.1016/j.pss.2006.05.039 · Cited by 198
The Origins of Perchlorate in the Martian Soil
Carrier, B. L., & Kounaves, S. P. (2015) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1002/2015gl064290 · Cited by 160
Metadata
- Authors
- Flynn, G. J., & McKay, D. S.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1990-08-30
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- B9
- Pages
- 14497-14509
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2118736449
- Cited by
- 158
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An assessment of the meteoritic contribution to the Martian soil. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/jb095ib09p14497
- The paper
- Flynn, G. J., & McKay, D. S. (1990). An assessment of the meteoritic contribution to the Martian soil. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth. https://doi.org/10.1029/jb095ib09p14497
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.