The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A major 2.1 Ga event of mafic magmatism in west Africa: An Early stage of crustal accretion
Abstract
Birimian terranes from West Africa (Mauritania, Senegal, Ivory Coast, Burkina Faso, Niger) comprise two major units: a dominantly mafic bimodal volcanic unit and a volcano‐detrital unit with mostly felsic to intermediate protolith. Stratigraphic relationships of these units are still a matter of debate but current work suggest that they both formed in a short time interval around 2.1 Ga. Widespread basaltic magmas from the bimodal unit have been analyzed for REE distributions and Sr‐Nd isotopes. Three Sm‐Nd isochrons on tholeiitic lavas were obtained at 2.229±0.042 Ga and initial ε Nd = 3.6±1.0 for Mauritania, 2.126±0.024 Ga and initial ε Nd = 2.9±0.7 for Burkina Faso, 2.063±0.041 Ga and initial ε Nd = 3.1± .0 for Eastern Senegal, data which compare with the age of 2.11±0.09 Ga and initial ε Nd = 2.1±1.8 obtained in Guyana by Gruau et al. (1985). Samples from other localities (Ivory Coast, Niger) give generally similar results. Although the variations of Sm/Nd ratios and the scatter of ε Nd(T) values from +1.2 to +4.3 preclude a single origin for these magmas, initial isotopic heterogeneities are unlikely to bias significantly the ages given by the isochrons which are in good agreement with U‐Pb zircon ages (Boher et al., 1989; unpublished data, 1990). Presence of lavas with frequent pillow structures and sediments virtually free of older recycled components suggests that Birimian terranes formed in ocean basins far from continental influence. The isotopic heterogeneities are not consistent with a MORB‐like mantle source. Most lavas are slightly depleted in LREE and inversion of the data through a melting model suggests 5–15 percent melting of a slightly depleted Iherzolite. Strong depletion (Burkina Faso) and slight enrichment (Senegal) are occasionally observed. With a noticeable trend of Ti enrichment with differentiation intermediate between that of MORB and IAT, the geochemical signature of Birimian basalts does not fit the best known geodynamic environments. Back‐arc or low‐Ti continental flood basalts provide a marginally good agreement but still face some difficulties. Oceanic flood basalts similar to those which form oceanic plateaus (e.g. in the Nauru basin) and later accreted to continents as allochtonous terranes represent the most acceptable modern analogue of many Proterozoic basalts. It is suggested that deep plumes piercing young lithosphere can generate huge amounts of tholeiites in a short time. Birimian basalts, like many Early Proterozoic basalts, may also be viewed as recent equivalents of the Archean greenstone belts. The modern komatiite of Gorgona Island is suggested to fit this model of intraplate volcanism. Although the 2.1 Ga magmatic event in West Africa has gone virtually unnoticed in the literature, it extends over several thousand kilometers and compares with the distribution of mantle‐derived magmatic activity in other major orogenic provinces (e.g. Superior). It shows that the growth rate of continents cannot be extrapolated from the data obtained solely from the best studied continents (North America, Europe, Australia). If such large crustal segments were overlooked, a spurious pattern of episodic activity of the mantle could arise.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The growth of the continent through geological time studied by Nd isotope analysis of shales
Allègre, C. J., & Rousseau, D. (1984) · Earth and Planetary Science Letters · doi:10.1016/0012-821x(84)90035-9 · Cited by 331
EWART, A., & HAWKESWORTH, C. J. (1987) · Journal of Petrology · doi:10.1093/petrology/28.3.495 · Cited by 316
Cited by
Precambrian plate tectonics: Criteria and evidence
Cawood, P. A., Kröner, A., & Pisarevsky, S. (2006) · GSA Today · doi:10.1130/gsat01607.1 · Cited by 326
The evolving nature of terrestrial crust from the Hadean, through the Archaean, into the Proterozoic
Kamber, B. S. (2015) · Precambrian Research · doi:10.1016/j.precamres.2014.12.007 · Cited by 255
Two types of Archean continental crust: Plume and plate tectonics on early Earth
Van Kranendonk, M. J. (2010) · American Journal of Science · doi:10.2475/10.2010.01 · Cited by 238
Wang, Z., Wilde, S. A., Wang, K., & Yu, L. (2004) · Precambrian Research · doi:10.1016/j.precamres.2003.12.014 · Cited by 183
Egal, E., Thiéblemont, D., Lahondère, D., Guerrot, C., Costea, C. A., Iliescu, D., Delor, C., Goujou, J.-C., Lafon, J. M., Tegyey, M., et al. (2002) · Precambrian Research · doi:10.1016/s0301-9268(02)00060-8 · Cited by 178
Metadata
- Authors
- Abouchami, W., Boher, M., Michard, A., & Albarede, F.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1990-10-10
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- B11
- Pages
- 17605-17629
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1996377397
- Cited by
- 558
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A major 2.1 Ga event of mafic magmatism in west Africa: An Early stage of crustal accretion. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/jb095ib11p17605
- The paper
- Abouchami, W., Boher, M., Michard, A., & Albarede, F. (1990). A major 2.1 Ga event of mafic magmatism in west Africa: An Early stage of crustal accretion. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth. https://doi.org/10.1029/jb095ib11p17605
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.