Cited by 137Archaeology and ancient environmental studiesTree-ring climate responsesGeology and Paleoclimatology Research

Carbon-14 in tree rings

Cain, William F., Suess, Hans E.·1976·Journal of Geophysical Research

Abstract

In order to investigate how reliably the carbon 14 content of tree rings reflects that of atmospheric carbon dioxide, two types of determinations were carried out: (1) carbon 14 determinations in annual rings from the beginning of this century until 1974 and (2) carbon 14 determinations in synchronous wood from the North American bristlecone pine and from European oak trees, dendrochronologically dated to have grown in the third and fourth century B.C. The first series of measurements showed that bomb-produced radiocarbon was incorporated in wood at a time when it was converted from sapwood to heartwood, whenever radiocarbon from bomb testing was present in the atmosphere. The second series showed that wood more than 2000 years old and grown on two different continents at different altitudes had, within the limits of experimental error, the same radiocarbon content. This work and other experimental evidence, obtained in part by other laboratories, show that tree rings reflect the average radiocarbon content of global atmospheric carbon dioxide accurately within several per mil. In rare cases, deviations of up to 10‰ may be possible. This means that a typical single radiocarbon date for wood or charcoal possesses an intrinsic uncertainty (viz., an estimated One-sigma error' in addition to all the other errors) of the order of ±50 years. This intrinsic uncertainty is independent of the absolute age of the sample. More accurate dates can, in principle, be obtained by the so-call…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/jc081i021p03688

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • While altitude has been postulated as a mechanism for increased 14C in tree rings, there is no evidence for this in more recent higher precision measurement of high elevation trees compared to low- and mid-elevation trees growing during 14C spike events.

    “While altitude has been postulated as mechanism for increased 14 Cin tree rings (Cain and Suess 1976), there is no evidence for this in more recent higher precision measurement of high elevation trees compared to low- and mid-elevation trees growing during 14 C spike events (Büntgen et al. 2018).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cain, W. F., & Suess, H. E.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research
Published
1976-07-20
Volume
81
Issue
21
Pages
3688-3694
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1995475473
Cited by
137
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
12.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Tree-ring climate responses
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
Keywords
carbon-14, tree rings, bomb carbon-14, atmospheric CO2, bristlecone pine, oak, wiggle matching, dendrochronology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review