Cited by 178Oceanographic and Atmospheric ProcessesOcean Waves and Remote SensingMeteorological Phenomena and Simulations

The generation of equatorial currents

Philander, S. G. H., Pacanowski, R. C.·1980·Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans

Abstract

In response to the sudden onset of zonal winds the surface layers of the ocean accelerate in the direction of the wind. Motion is most intense near the equator where a jet forms within a week. The next stage in the evolution of equilibrium conditions is associated with wave fronts, excited initially at the coasts, that propagate across the ocean basin and establish zonal density gradients. Wave modes trapped in and above the strong shallow tropical thermocline because of internal reflection there are responsible for the adjustment of the upper ocean in low latitudes. These thermocline‐trapped modes extend over a depth greater than that of the wind‐driven surface currents and hence give rise to an undercurrent in the thermocline. This undercurrent is zonal and particularly intense near the equator, where it appears in the wake of an eastward traveling Kelvin or westward traveling Rossby wave after about 1 month. In the case of eastward winds, nonlinearities intensify the eastward equatorial surface jet and weaken the westward undercurrent. In the case of westward winds a different nonlinear mechanisms intensifies the eastward Equatorial Undercurrent and weakens the westward surface flow. In a 5000‐km wide basin, equilibrium equatorial currents are established about 150 days after the onset of the winds. The response time of the ocean below a depth of a few hundred meters is much longer. Winds with no spatial and a simple temporal structure generate currents with a complex vert…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/jc085ic02p01123

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The failure in simulating the South Equatorial Current is probably due to nonlinear dynamics, for instance vertical advection.

    “They speculated that the failure in simulating SEC is probably due to nonlinear dynamics, for instance vertical advection [Philander and Pacanowski, 1980].”

    From Seasonal cycle in the upper equatorial Atlantic Ocean (2009) · cites this paper as Philander and Pacanowski, 1980

  • The result that vertical advection brings more eastward momentum to the surface layer and reduces westward momentum is consistent with Philander and Pacanowski [1980].

    “This is consistent with Philander and Pacanowski [1980].”

    From Seasonal cycle in the upper equatorial Atlantic Ocean (2009) · cites this paper as Philander and Pacanowski, 1980

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 22 · Cited by 178

Authors
Philander, S. G. H., & Pacanowski, R. C.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans
Published
1980-02-20
Volume
85
Issue
C2
Pages
1123-1136
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2061906032
Cited by
178
References
22
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
9.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Ocean Waves and Remote Sensing
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
Keywords
equatorial currents, wind-driven currents, Equatorial Undercurrent, Kelvin waves, Rossby waves, wavefronts, nonlinear wave interaction, energy dissipation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review