The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Eddy kinetic energy in the North Atlantic from surface drifters
Abstract
One hundred ten satellite‐tracked freely drifting buoys measured velocities and trajectories of the near‐surface currents in the North Atlantic. Mean velocity values and the velocity variance about the mean were calculated for different regions. A horizontal map of eddy kinetic energy was prepared on a 2°×2° grid between latitudes 20° and 55°N. Maximum eddy energy (∼3000 cm 2 s−2) coincides with the high speed Gulf Stream jet where it begins large amplitude meanders near 37°N 67°W. A tongue of high eddy energy coincides with the Stream's path eastward and around the Grand Banks into the Newfoundland Basin where values of 1000 cm 2 s−2 are found. A weaker tongue extends eastward across the mid‐Atlantic Ridge near 45°N. A second weak extension reaches southeastward from the Stream and crosses the mid‐Atlantic Ridge between 30° and 35°N. North and south of the Stream, eddy energy diminishes rapidly reaching an e folding at 300 km from the axis. Values of 200 cm 2 s−2 were observed in the mid‐gyre region and 100 cm 2 s−2 in the Eastern North Atlantic and North Equatorial Current. Although the gross distribution of eddy energy is similar to that determined from ship drift measurements, there are significant differences. Eddy energy from drifters amounts to about twice the value measured by ship drift in the Gulf Stream and one half the ship drift values in the mid‐gyre. It is suggested that these differences are due to the horizontal averaging of mesoscale motion and the errors in navigation, both of which are problems with the ship drift technique.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Atmospheric and Oceanic Fluid Dynamics: Fundamentals and Large-Scale Circulation
Vallis, G. K. (2017) · doi:10.1017/9781107588417 · Cited by 1,891
Global high-resolution mapping of ocean circulation from TOPEX/Poseidon and ERS-1 and -2
Ducet, N., Le Traon, P. Y., & Reverdin, G. (2000) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans · doi:10.1029/2000jc900063 · Cited by 1,725
Global observations of large oceanic eddies
Chelton, D. B., Schlax, M. G., Samelson, R. M., & de Szoeke, R. A. (2007) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/2007gl030812 · Cited by 1,252
Lumpkin, R., & Pazos, M. (2007) · Lagrangian Analysis and Prediction of Coastal and Ocean Dynamics · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511535901.003 · Cited by 360
Mesoscale eddies, satellite altimetry, and new production in the Sargasso Sea
Siegel, D. A., McGillicuddy, D. J., & Fields, E. A. (1999) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans · doi:10.1029/1999jc900051 · Cited by 290
Metadata
- Authors
- Richardson, P. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1983-05-20
- Volume
- 88
- Issue
- C7
- Pages
- 4355-4367
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2024431874
- Cited by
- 299
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Eddy kinetic energy in the North Atlantic from surface drifters. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/jc088ic07p04355
- The paper
- Richardson, P. L. (1983). Eddy kinetic energy in the North Atlantic from surface drifters. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans. https://doi.org/10.1029/jc088ic07p04355
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.