The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Photochemistry of biogenic emissions over the Amazon forest
Open accessAbstract
The boundary layer chemistry over the Amazon forest during the dry season is simulated with a photochemical model. Results are in good agreement with measurements of isoprene, NO, ozone, and organic acids. Photochemical reactions of biogenic isoprene and NOx can supply most of the ozone observed in the boundary layer. Production of ozone is very sensitive to the availability of NOx, but is insensitive to the isoprene source strength. High concentrations of total odd nitrogen (NOy,) are predicted for the planetary boundary layer, about 1 ppb in the mixed layer and 0.75 ppb in the convective cloud layer. Most of the odd nitrogen (≈70%) is present as PAN‐type species, which are removed by dry deposition to the forest. The observed daytime variations of isoprene are explained by a strong dependence of the isoprene emission flux on sun angle. Nighttime losses of isoprene exceed rates of reaction with NO 3 and O 3 and appear to reflect dry‐deposition processes. The 24‐hour averaged isoprene emission flux is calculated to be 38 mg m−2 d−1. Photooxidation of isoprene could account for a large fraction of the CO enrichment observed in the boundary layer under unpolluted conditions and could constitute an important atmospheric source of formic acid, methacrylic acid, and pyruvic acid.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Organic aerosol and global climate modelling: a review
Kanakidou, M., Seinfeld, J. H., Pandis, S. N., Barnes, I., Dentener, F. J., Facchini, M. C., Van Dingenen, R., Ervens, B., Nenes, A., Nielsen, C. J., et al. (2005) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-5-1053-2005 · Cited by 3,244
Three‐dimensional climatological distribution of tropospheric OH: Update and evaluation
Spivakovsky, C. M., Logan, J. A., Montzka, S. A., Balkanski, Y. J., Foreman‐Fowler, M., Jones, D. B. A., Horowitz, L. W., Fusco, A. C., Brenninkmeijer, C. A. M., Prather, M. J., et al. (2000) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/1999jd901006 · Cited by 910
Self-citationThe sensitivity of ozone to nitrogen oxides and hydrocarbons in regional ozone episodes
Sillman, S., Logan, J. A., & Wofsy, S. C. (1990) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/jd095id02p01837 · Cited by 687
Self-citationFormation of atmospheric particles from organic acids produced by forests
Kavouras, I. G., Mihalopoulos, N., & Stephanou, E. G. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/27179 · Cited by 481
Formation of OH radicals in the gas phase reactions of O3 with a series of terpenes
Atkinson, R., Aschmann, S. M., Arey, J., & Shorees, B. (1992) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/92jd00062 · Cited by 349
Metadata
- Authors
- Jacob, D. J., & Wofsy, S. C.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1988-02-20
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- D2
- Pages
- 1477-1486
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2157424290
- Cited by
- 481
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 31.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Photochemistry of biogenic emissions over the Amazon forest. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/jd093id02p01477
- The paper
- Jacob, D. J., & Wofsy, S. C. (1988). Photochemistry of biogenic emissions over the Amazon forest. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/jd093id02p01477
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.