The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Composition and sources of aerosols from the Amazon Basin
Abstract
Aerosols were sampled in the Amazon Basin, as part of the Global Tropospheric Experiment (GTE), during the Amazon Boundary Layer Experiment (ABLE 2A) in July–August 1985. Fine‐ and coarse‐particle fractions were analyzed for 22 elements by particle‐induced X ray emission. Gravimetric mass, black carbon, sulfate, and nitrate concentrations were also determined. Morphological and trace element measurements of individual particles were carried out by automated electron probe X ray microanalysis. Various receptor models, including multivariate methods and a chemical mass balance model, were employed in the interpretation of the bulk trace element concentrations. Three factors explained over 85% of the variability of fine‐ and coarse‐mode variables. On the basis of the elemental composition of the factors, two could be identified as plant related, and the third was a soil dust component. Of the coarse‐mode aerosol mass concentration (of 7.6±1.6 μg/m 3), 62% could be attributed to aerosols released by the vegetation and 11% to soil dust. In the fine mode, soil dust accounted for less than 10% of the measured mass concentration (of 6.8±3.9 μg/m 3). The variables related to the plant component were K, P, S, Ca, Mg, Cl, Rb, and the gravimetric mass. The elemental profile of the plant component resembled the bulk plant composition. By single‐particle analysis coupled with hierarchical cluster analysis, six to nine different biogenic‐related particle groups could be identified in the fine‐ and coarse‐aerosol modes. Almost all particle types consisted predominantly of carbonaceous material, with trace amounts of K, S, Ca, P, Cl, and Na. Only one group, comprising less than 11% of the total number of particles, consisted of soil dust–related aerosol.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A global assessment of natural sources of atmospheric trace metals
Nriagu, J. O. (1989) · Nature · doi:10.1038/338047a0 · Cited by 1,702
Atmospheric Aerosols: Biogeochemical Sources and Role in Atmospheric Chemistry
Andreae, M. O., & Crutzen, P. J. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.276.5315.1052 · Cited by 1,644
Primary biological aerosol particles in the atmosphere: a review
Després, V. R., Huffman, J. A., Burrows, S. M., Hoose, C., Safatov, A. S., Buryak, G., Fröhlich-Nowoisky, J., Elbert, W., Andreae, M. O., Pöschl, U., et al. (2012) · Tellus B: Chemical and Physical Meteorology · doi:10.3402/tellusb.v64i0.15598 · Cited by 1,500
Abundance of Cellular Material and Proteins in the Atmosphere
Jaenicke, R. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1106335 · Cited by 549
Artaxo, P., Rizzo, L. V., Brito, J. F., Barbosa, H. M. J., Arana, A., Sena, E. T., Cirino, G. G., Bastos, W., Martin, S. T., & Andreae, M. O. (2013) · Faraday Discussions · doi:10.1039/c3fd00052d · Cited by 257
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Artaxo, P., Storms, H., Bruynseels, F., Van Grieken, R., & Maenhaut, W.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1988-02-20
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- D2
- Pages
- 1605-1615
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2006764532
- Cited by
- 193
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Composition and sources of aerosols from the Amazon Basin. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/jd093id02p01605
- The paper
- Artaxo, P., Storms, H., Bruynseels, F., Van Grieken, R., & Maenhaut, W. (1988). Composition and sources of aerosols from the Amazon Basin. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/jd093id02p01605
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.