The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A crustal section across the Puerto Rico trench
Abstract
A crustal section across the Puerto Rico Trench, from 450 km north to 250 km south of San Juan, was deduced from seismic refraction and gravity data. The result, a refinement of previous work, was made possible through more complete seismic refraction coverage and a program for high-speed electronic computation of two-dimensional gravity problems. On the basis of refraction data, the crust was divided into five layers having compressional wave velocities of 1.54, 2.1, 3.8, 5.6, and 7.0 km/sec. Densities taken from a density-velocity curve compiled by Nafe and Drake are 1.03, 2.0, 2.4, 2.7, and 3.0 gm/cc, respectively. Depths to the Mohorovicic discontinuity were computed from the gravity data using sub-crustal density of 3.4 gm/cc, which corresponds to 8.2 km/sec on the density-velocity curve. (A similar calculation was made using a sub-crustal density of 3.3 gm/cc). Depth to M under the trench is about 20 km decreasing sharply on both sides. Northwards, it reaches a minimum of about 10 km under the Outer Ridge and then deepens gradually to about 13 km beneath the southern margin of the Nares Basin. South of the trench M rises under the Puerto Rico Shelf to about 17 km and then deepens sharply to about 30 km beneath Puerto Rico. South of Puerto Rico the depth decreases again to about 14 km under the Venezuelan Basin. Depths to M were also obtained by using Airy isostatic anomalies and assuming constant crustal density of 2.67 gm/cc over a mantle of density 3.27 gm/cc. The crustal section thus deduced differs significantly from that obtained when the density structure within the crust was considered.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Talwani, M., Worzel, J. L., & Landisman, M. (1959) · Journal of Geophysical Research · doi:10.1029/jz064i001p00049 · Cited by 1,655
Self-citationNafe, J. E., & Drake, C. L. (1957) · Geophysics · doi:10.1190/1.1438386 · Cited by 487
Physics and chemistry of the earth
Emmons, R. J. (1959) · Journal of the Franklin Institute · doi:10.1016/0016-0032(59)90045-6 · Cited by 170
Cited by
Computation of Synthetic Seismograms with the Reflectivity Method and Comparison with Observations
Fuchs, K., & Muller, G. (1971) · Geophysical Journal International · doi:10.1111/j.1365-246x.1971.tb01834.x · Cited by 1,015
Some remarks on heat flow and gravity anomalies
McKenzie, D. P. (1967) · Journal of Geophysical Research · doi:10.1029/jz072i024p06261 · Cited by 751
Phanerozoic addition rates to the continental crust and crustal growth
Reymer, A., & Schubert, G. (1984) · Tectonics · doi:10.1029/tc003i001p00063 · Cited by 569
The Moho depth map of the European Plate
Grad, M., Tiira, T., & ESC Working Group (2009) · Geophysical Journal International · doi:10.1111/j.1365-246x.2008.03919.x · Cited by 425
Thermal regime of a downgoing slab and new global tectonics
Minear, J. W., & Toksöz, M. N. (1970) · Journal of Geophysical Research · doi:10.1029/jb075i008p01397 · Cited by 349
Metadata
- Authors
- Talwani, M., Sutton, G. H., & Worzel, J. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1959-10
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1545-1555
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2017477542
- Cited by
- 296
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 18.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A crustal section across the Puerto Rico trench. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/jz064i010p01545
- The paper
- Talwani, M., Sutton, G. H., & Worzel, J. L. (1959). A crustal section across the Puerto Rico trench. Journal of Geophysical Research. https://doi.org/10.1029/jz064i010p01545
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.