The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Volume diffusion as a mechanism for discordant lead ages
Abstract
The discordant U-Pb ages of sixteen minerals having Pb207/Pb206 ages of 2400 to 2700 m.y. closely fit a 2800 to 600 m.y. chord when placed on a pb207/U235-Pb206/U238 diagram. These minerals are from the continents of North America, Africa, Europe, Australia, and Asia. If the data are interpreted as evidence of an episode of loss of lead 600 m.y. ago from minerals that were crystallized 2800 m.y. ago, it is strange that the same time of loss is indicated for all four continents. Moreover, most of the samples are from shield areas where no evidence has been found for metamorphic events 600 m.y. ago. As an alternative explanation, lead may be considered to diffuse continuously from crystals at a rate governed by a diffusion coefficient (D), the effective radius (a), and the concentration gradient. Calculations of the present-day Pb206/U238 and Pb207/U235ratios as a function of the parameter D/a2 yield ratios that lie on a 2800 to 600 m.y. chord on a Pb206/U238-Pb207/U235 diagram for losses of up to two-thirds of the lead produced in the sample. This method is capable of explaining the regularity of the age patterns from one continent to another and does away with the need for episodic losses of lead simultaneously in all the areas 600 m.y. ago. Other examples have been found of suites of minerals with discordant ages which fit this hypothesis; they include minerals with apparent ages of 1900, 1700, and 1100 m.y. The behavior of uranium-lead ages in several zircons from metamorphic rocks is indicative of an activation energy for diffusion of lead of less than 10 kcal/mol over a temperature range of 50° to 400°–600°C. This inference, when considered with available data for the diffusion of argon from micas, is capable of explaining why uranium-lead ages measured from zircon may be either greater or less than the potassium-argon ages of coexisting mica.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The effect of initial230Th disequilibrium on young UPb ages: the Makalu case, Himalaya
Schärer, U. (1984) · Earth and Planetary Science Letters · doi:10.1016/0012-821x(84)90114-6 · Cited by 803
Hanchar, J. M., & Miller, C. F. (1993) · Chemical Geology · doi:10.1016/0009-2541(93)90244-d · Cited by 565
Hadean age for a post-magma-ocean zircon confirmed by atom-probe tomography
Valley, J. W., Cavosie, A. J., Ushikubo, T., Reinhard, D. A., Lawrence, D. F., Larson, D. J., Clifton, P. H., Kelly, T. F., Wilde, S. A., Moser, D. E., et al. (2014) · Nature Geoscience · doi:10.1038/ngeo2075 · Cited by 549
Schoene, B. (2014) · Treatise on Geochemistry · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-095975-7.00310-7 · Cited by 309
Mezger, K., Hanson, G. N., & Bohlen, S. R. (1989) · Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology · doi:10.1007/bf00375301 · Cited by 254
Metadata
- Authors
- Tilton, G. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1960-09
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2933-2945
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1975659301
- Cited by
- 243
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Volume diffusion as a mechanism for discordant lead ages. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/jz065i009p02933
- The paper
- Tilton, G. R. (1960). Volume diffusion as a mechanism for discordant lead ages. Journal of Geophysical Research. https://doi.org/10.1029/jz065i009p02933
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.