The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Recursive solution to the multichannel filtering problem
Abstract
Systems made up of arrays of sensors (seismographs, hydrophones, antennas, meteorological stations) receive geophysical data on a number of channels. Such multichannel data can be processed by means of a multichannel least-squares (Wiener) digital filter; the filter is determined by requiring that the sum of the mean-square errors between the desired outputs and the actual outputs for each channel be minimized. This requirement leads to a set of simultaneous linear equations, called the normal equations, where each element is itself a square matrix. The coefficients of the digital filter are given by the solution of these normal equations. An exact recursive procedure is derived for the numerical solution of the normal equations. In this recursive procedure advantage is taken of the fact that the matrix of the normal equations is an autocorrelation matrix, and hence is in the form of a Toeplitz matrix, namely one with equal elements along any diagonal. A set of auxiliary coefficients that are generated in the recursive procedure are the coefficients of matrix-valued polynomials which are the counterparts of the classical (scalar-valued) polynomials orthogonal on the unit circle. This set of auxiliary coefficients may also be used for a sideward recursion that corresponds to shifting the time index of the right-hand side of the normal equations. This sideward recursion is valuable in applications because it represents a relatively inexpensive way of determining the filter that incorporates the optimum time delay between the multichannel input signal and the multichannel output signal. The machine time required to solve the normal equations for a filter with m (matrix-valued) coefficients is proportional to m2 for the proposed recursive procedure, as compared with m3 for conventional techniques for the solution of simultaneous equations. Another advantage of using the recursive procedure is that it only requires computer storage space proportional to m, rather than to m2 as in the case of the conventional techniques.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1971) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2013-0-02379-1 · Cited by 8,505
Szegő, G. (1939) · Colloquium Publications · doi:10.1090/coll/023 · Cited by 2,110
Mathematical development of discrete filters for the detection of nuclear explosions
Robinson, E. A. (1963) · Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/jz068i019p05559 · Cited by 46
Self-citation
Cited by
Time-dependent ARMA modeling of nonstationary signals
Grenier, Y. (1983) · IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/tassp.1983.1164152 · Cited by 435
Fast Algorithms for Signal Processing
Blahut, R. E. (2010) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511760921 · Cited by 274
Metadata
- Authors
- Wiggins, R. A., & Robinson, E. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1965-04-15
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1885-1891
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2162681512
- Cited by
- 369
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 4.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recursive solution to the multichannel filtering problem. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/jz070i008p01885
- The paper
- Wiggins, R. A., & Robinson, E. A. (1965). Recursive solution to the multichannel filtering problem. Journal of Geophysical Research. https://doi.org/10.1029/jz070i008p01885
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.