The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Experimental deformation of serpentinite and its tectonic implications
Abstract
Experimental investigation into the strength and ductility of serpentinite at temperatures to 700°C and confining pressures to 5 kb has yielded results important to the understanding of the role of serpentinite in orogenesis. Sealed specimens of antigorite-chrysotile serpentinite, with ultimate strength comparable to that of granite at room temperature, showed a marked weakening above 500–600°C; a mesh-textured serpentinite containing lizardite, chrysotile, and a minor amount of brucite showed a similar loss of strength at 300–350°C. Brittleness always accompanied the high-temperature weakening, although the samples showing high strength at lower temperatures were often ductile. Petrographic and X-ray examinations reveal that serpentine in the weakened and embrittled specimens has undergone partial dehydration to forsterite and talc. The embrittlement and weakening is attributed to a reduction in the effective confining pressure due to the pore pressure of the water released during dehydration and to a loss in cohesive strength due to changes in the structure upon dehydration. The hypothesis of tectonic emplacement of serpentinites of the alpine type thus becomes highly plausible at temperatures great enough for dehydration weakening, while being difficult to accept at lower temperatures where the strength of the serpentinite is high. Weakening upon heating to the appropriate dehydration temperature in the range 300–600°C of a partially serpentinized oceanic lower crust or upper mantle should also serve to concentrate deformation in the heated belt, thus facilitating mountain building. The embrittlement associated with dehydration extends the maximum theoretical depth for brittle fracture in the mantle to that of the deepest hydrated phases.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
An inverted continental Moho and serpentinization of the forearc mantle
Bostock, M. G., Hyndman, R. D., Rondenay, S., & Peacock, S. M. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/417536a · Cited by 632
Mantle phase changes and deep-earthquake faulting in subducting lithosphere
Kirby, S. H., Durham, W. B., & Stern, L. A. (1991) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.252.5003.216 · Cited by 475
Mantle Earthquake Mechanisms and the Sinking of the Lithosphere
ISACKS, B., & MOLNAR, P. (1969) · Nature · doi:10.1038/2231121a0 · Cited by 341
The brittle-ductile transition in rocks: Recent experimental and theoretical progress
Evans, B., Fredrich, J. T., & Wong, T.-F. (1990) · Geophysical Monograph Series · doi:10.1029/gm056p0001 · Cited by 259
Apparent stresses of earthquakes on ridges compared to apparent stresses of earthquakes in trenches
Wyss, M. (1970) · Geophysical Journal International · doi:10.1111/j.1365-246x.1970.tb00153.x · Cited by 58
Metadata
- Authors
- Raleigh, C. B., & Paterson, M. S.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1965-08-15
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 3965-3985
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1963862763
- Cited by
- 774
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Experimental deformation of serpentinite and its tectonic implications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/jz070i016p03965
- The paper
- Raleigh, C. B., & Paterson, M. S. (1965). Experimental deformation of serpentinite and its tectonic implications. Journal of Geophysical Research. https://doi.org/10.1029/jz070i016p03965
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.