The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Collisions in the asteroid belt
Abstract
Öpik's theory of collision of planetary bodies has been generalized to include the case where the orbits of both colliding bodies are ellipses. The resulting expression can be written in a form similar to Öpik's result for the crossing of an elliptical orbit with a circular orbit. However, in this generalized case the quantities appearing in the expression refer to the collision probability for a given orientation of the perihelion of one of the bodies (field body); to the x component of velocity of the other body alone (test body) in the reference frame of the orbit of the field body, and to the properly modified expression for the relative velocity of the two bodies. Furthermore, even for a given orientation of the perihelion of the field body, the expression now has four values; the total probablity is the sum of these values. This result must finally be integrated over all possible orientations of the perihelion of the field body and over all possible relative orientations of the nodes of the two bodies. This expression has been used to calculate the collision probability of meteorites (test bodies) with given orbital elements moving in a field of bodies having orbital elements corresponding to those of the visible asteroids. It is found that this collision probability is nearly independent of the orbital elements of the test body. This is in general agreement with previous approaches to this problem by Piotrowski and by Arnold; however, there are differences in details. The results of these calculations have been applied to the problem of the suppression of old cosmic-ray ages by mutual destruction of stone meteorites in the asteroid belt, under a range of assumptions regarding the size-frequency distribution of matter in the asteroid belt. It is found that the necessary very short (∼30 million year) destruction lifetimes are obtained only if the increase in the number of small bodies with decreasing radius is nearly that allowed by an upper limit to the area of the asteroid belt determined by the intensity of the gegenschein, and then only for a very small value of the minimum mass needed to destroy a body of a given mass by collision.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Origin of the cataclysmic Late Heavy Bombardment period of the terrestrial planets
Gomes, R., Levison, H. F., Tsiganis, K., & Morbidelli, A. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03676 · Cited by 1,737
Noble gases in carbonaceous chondrites
Mazor, E., Heymann, D., & Anders, E. (1970) · Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/0016-7037(70)90031-1 · Cited by 414
Metadata
- Authors
- Wetherill, G. W.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1967-05-01
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2429-2444
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1970508912
- Cited by
- 320
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Collisions in the asteroid belt. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/jz072i009p02429
- The paper
- Wetherill, G. W. (1967). Collisions in the asteroid belt. Journal of Geophysical Research. https://doi.org/10.1029/jz072i009p02429
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.