The DOI matches its Crossref record.
An experimental evaluation of single domain theories
Abstract
The Néel theory of magnetization relaxation has been systematically and quantitatively tested for six samples containing synthetic and natural single domain grains. The results of a wide range of experiments involving time, temperature, and direct and alternating magnetic fields were compared with theoretical results predicted by using the Néel theory and the experimental grain size‐coercivity distribution of each sample. Good agreement was found for many experiments involving small field remanences, where grain interaction effects are negligible. Most of the discordant results could be explained by using either the Preisach theory or an extended form of the Néel theory, which takes account of interactions. The two methods are shown to be equivalent, but the Néel theory is more useful in analyzing thermal processes that are intractable by the Preisach method. The similarity of the behavior of synthetic and natural samples suggests that monodomain material is important in many rocks, but experiments on a wide variety of rock types are needed for verification.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Superparamagnetic and single-domain threshold sizes in magnetite
Dunlop, D. J. (1973) · Journal of Geophysical Research · doi:10.1029/jb078i011p01780 · Cited by 358
Self-citationEgli, R. (2004) · Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica · doi:10.1023/b:sgeg.0000020839.45304.6d · Cited by 318
Walcott, C., Gould, J. L., & Kirschvink, J. L. (1979) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.472725 · Cited by 302
Magnetic properties of variably serpentinized abyssal peridotites
Oufi, O., Cannat, M., & Horen, H. (2002) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth · doi:10.1029/2001jb000549 · Cited by 256
Toward an optimal geomagnetic field intensity determination technique
Yu, Y., Tauxe, L., & Genevey, A. (2004) · Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems · doi:10.1029/2003gc000630 · Cited by 229
Metadata
- Authors
- Dunlop, D. J., & West, G. F.
- Venue
- Reviews of Geophysics
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1969-11
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 709-757
- ISSN
- 0096-1043 (ISSN-L)
- 8755-1209
- 1944-9208
- OpenAlex
- W2141107872
- Cited by
- 218
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An experimental evaluation of single domain theories. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/rg007i004p00709
- The paper
- Dunlop, D. J., & West, G. F. (1969). An experimental evaluation of single domain theories. Reviews of Geophysics. https://doi.org/10.1029/rg007i004p00709
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.