Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 367

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The North Atlantic general circulation west of 50°W determined by inverse methods

Wunsch, Carl·1978·Reviews of Geophysics

Abstract

We review linear inverse theory in the context of its application to determining the general circulation of the ocean. Inverse methods are intimately related to least squares and rank deficient regression problems. Results are dependent upon the model assumed; in this paper all models are linear, geostrophic, and mass conserving, and they differ only in the initial reference pressure for the dynamic computations. We show how to compute the resolution of both the observations and the solutions, the degree of data independence, and the solution variance. To handle the underdetermined nature of the problem, we impose a conventional requirement of maximum simplicity relative to the initial model. More generally, the methodology provides a powerful technique for handling imperfect and noisy chemical and dynamical tracers and for assimilating a great variety of different information into dynamically consistent circulation schemes. In the latter part of the paper the methods are applied to the western North Atlantic west of the 50°W meridian. An attempt to use a full data set failed owing to the nonsynoptic nature of the observations. Two initial models were then applied to a reduced data set defined by seven boxes in which conservation of total mass and of four additional layers was required. Model I, which initially has a reference level at the bottom, leads to a large Gulf Stream transport (124 Sv) with an active recirculation zone to the south. Model II begins with a reference level at 2000 dbar and leads to a weaker Gulf Stream with recirculation zones on both sides. The southern recirculation breaks up into smaller scales. Both models yield a strong large‐scale gyre to the south of the Mediterranean salt tongue. The residual error is 2–3 Sv rms in both models, but it appears that systematic errors due to the seasonal variability probably exceed this value.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/rg016i004p00583

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 367

Metadata

Authors
Wunsch, C.
Venue
Reviews of Geophysics
Published
1978-11
Volume
16
Issue
4
Pages
583-620
ISSN
  • 0096-1043 (ISSN-L)
  • 8755-1209
  • 1944-9208
OpenAlex
W2073558207
Cited by
367
References
0
FWCI
5.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The North Atlantic general circulation west of 50°W determined by inverse methods. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/rg016i004p00583
The paper
Wunsch, C. (1978). The North Atlantic general circulation west of 50°W determined by inverse methods. Reviews of Geophysics. https://doi.org/10.1029/rg016i004p00583

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.