The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Are carbonaceous chondrites primitive or processed? A review
Abstract
Carbonaceous chondrites, generally considered to be the most primitive surviving materials from the early solar system, form a distinctive group in terms of bulk Mg/Si, Ca/Si, and Al/Si ratios. The carbonaceous chondrites can be subdivided into five groups (CI, CM, CR, CO, and CV) based on a number of petrologic and chemical criteria. Petrographic observations indicate that most carbonaceous chondrites have been processed, either by thermal metamorphism in the case of CO and CV chondrites or by low‐temperature aqueous alteration in the case of CI, CM, and CR chondrites. Thermal metamorphism resulted in Fe/Mg exchange between chondrules, olivine and pyroxene grains, and matrix, changes in the compositions of metal grains, and textural integration. Aqueous alteration probably produced hydrated phyllosilicate matrix phases and resulted in alteration of chondrules and replacement and vein filling by secondary carbonates and sulfates. The changes incurred during these processes appear to have been largely isochemical. However, if certain constituents behaved as open‐system components, volatile elements or compounds may have been depleted during metamorphism, and isotopic patterns may have been changed during aqueous alteration. The recognition of two different types of postaccretional processes resulting in petrological modifications necessitates a reinterpretation of the classification system for carbonaceous chondrites.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sm-Nd isotopic evolution of chondrites
Jacobsen, S. B., & Wasserburg, G. J. (1980) · Earth and Planetary Science Letters · doi:10.1016/0012-821x(80)90125-9 · Cited by 2,094
Accretionary dust mantles in CM chondrites: Evidence for solar nebula processes
Metzler, K., Bischoff, A., & Stöffler, D. (1992) · Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/0016-7037(92)90365-p · Cited by 377
The compositional classification of chondrites—I. The carbonaceous chondrite groups
Kallemeyn, G. W., & Wasson, J. T. (1981) · Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/0016-7037(81)90145-9 · Cited by 325
Calcium carbonate and sulfate of possible extraterrestrial origin in the EETA 79001 meteorite
Gooding, J. L., Wentworth, S. J., & Zolensky, M. E. (1988) · Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/0016-7037(88)90361-4 · Cited by 149
De LEUW, S., RUBIN, A. E., & WASSON, J. T. (2010) · Meteoritics & Planetary Science · doi:10.1111/j.1945-5100.2010.01037.x · Cited by 106
Metadata
- Authors
- McSween, H. Y.
- Venue
- Reviews of Geophysics
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1979-08
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1059-1078
- ISSN
- 0096-1043 (ISSN-L)
- 8755-1209
- 1944-9208
- OpenAlex
- W2105366506
- Cited by
- 294
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Are carbonaceous chondrites primitive or processed? A review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/rg017i005p01059
- The paper
- McSween, H. Y. (1979). Are carbonaceous chondrites primitive or processed? A review. Reviews of Geophysics. https://doi.org/10.1029/rg017i005p01059
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.