The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The inference of North Atlantic circulation patterns from climatological hydrographic data
Abstract
We present a review of β spiral techniques which have recently been developed for the determination of absolute velocity profiles from hydrographic observations. A specific technique is then designed and applied to the North Atlantic part of Levitus' (1982) climatological hydrographic atlas with the aim of estimating reference velocities and diffusivities for heat, salt, and potential vorticity. These quantities are determined on a 1° grid from the local gradients of temperature and salinity under the constraints of the thermal wind relations and the conservation of the respective tracers including diapycnic and isopycnic mixing terms. The estimation procedure includes the statistical framework of inverse modeling in the weighting of the constraints by the data noise variances and the determination of the covariances of the model parameters. The resulting circulation pattern bears strong resemblance to the classical view of the North Atlantic circulation as put foreward by Wüst (1935) and Defant (1941). The upper layers are dominated by the Gulf Stream/North Atlantic current system with a broad subtropical gyre recirculation. In the lower layer a western boundary current is fed from Norwegian Sea overflow penetrating the Gibbs fracture zone and partly circulating around the Labrador Sea. As a consequence of the climatological averaging the currents appear in broad shape with much reduced velocities, in particular in the upper layer. The vertical structure reveals an almost horizontal level of no motion pattern much along the concepts of Defant (1941). Diffusion coefficients were determined for an upper layer (depth of mixed layer to 800 m depth) and a lower layer (800 m to 2000 m). The spatial pattern of these coefficients correlates with maps of eddy activity, showing higher values in the strong current regimes and low values within the subtropical and subpolar gyre. Average values in the lower layer of the quiet regions are 10−5 m²/s and 10² m²/s for the diapycnal and isopycnal diffusivity, respectively, and 10−1 m²/s for the vertical diffusivity of vorticity (which yields 10² m²/s for the lateral diffusivity of potential vorticity). Toward the regions of strong currents and in the upper layer these values roughly increase by an order of magnitude.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Solving Least Squares Problems
Lawson, C. L., & Hanson, R. J. (1995) · doi:10.1137/1.9781611971217 · Cited by 7,103
Climatological Atlas of the World Ocean
Levitus, S. (1983) · Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union · doi:10.1029/eo064i049p00962-02 · Cited by 3,078
Cited by
Krauss, W. (1986) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans · doi:10.1029/jc091ic04p05061 · Cited by 254
Metadata
- Authors
- Olbers, D. J., Wenzel, M., & Willebrand, J.
- Venue
- Reviews of Geophysics
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1985-11
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 313-356
- ISSN
- 0096-1043 (ISSN-L)
- 8755-1209
- 1944-9208
- OpenAlex
- W2152289058
- Cited by
- 159
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The inference of North Atlantic circulation patterns from climatological hydrographic data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/rg023i004p00313
- The paper
- Olbers, D. J., Wenzel, M., & Willebrand, J. (1985). The inference of North Atlantic circulation patterns from climatological hydrographic data. Reviews of Geophysics. https://doi.org/10.1029/rg023i004p00313
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.