Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 245

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Saturation and Equilibrium Conditions for Impact Cratering on the Lunar Surface: Criteria and Implications

Gault, Donald E.·1970·Radio Science

Abstract

A model based on first principles and laboratory results is presented for describing and evaluating long term effects of meteoritic impact against the lunar surface. The evolution of the cratered surface and concomitant regolith is calculated and compared with observations and analyses of Lunar Orbiter photographs. It is indicated that most craters are of impact origin, but gross differences in the apparent ages of surfaces in various units and regions of the moon imply that endogenic processes also must have been active, probably since the beginning of Precambrian time and, perhaps, as recently as a few million years ago.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/rs005i002p00273

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 245

Metadata

Authors
Gault, D. E.
Venue
Radio Science
Published
1970-02
Volume
5
Issue
2
Pages
273-291
ISSN
  • 0048-6604 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-799X
OpenAlex
W1965839832
Cited by
245
References
0
FWCI
17.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Saturation and Equilibrium Conditions for Impact Cratering on the Lunar Surface: Criteria and Implications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/rs005i002p00273
The paper
Gault, D. E. (1970). Saturation and Equilibrium Conditions for Impact Cratering on the Lunar Surface: Criteria and Implications. Radio Science. https://doi.org/10.1029/rs005i002p00273

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.