The DOI matches its Crossref record.
flexural rotation of normal faults
Abstract
A conceptual model is proposed for the generation of low‐angle normal faults in Metamorphic Core Complexes. The model is based on three assumptions: (1) the isostatic response to normal fault motion is of regional extent; (2) when a fault segment is significantly rotated from the optimum angle of slip, relative to the crustal stress field, it is replaced by a new planar fault oriented in the optimum direction; and (3) the fault cuts the entire upper crust and fault motion always nucleates in the same region at the base of the upper crust. The stress field is considered to be uniform through the crust and the regional isostatic response of the crust to loads is computed using the thin plate flexure approximations. Active low‐angle normal faults are difficult to reconcile with rock mechanics theories, earthquake focal mechanism studies, and geochronologic results indicating rapid cooling of core complex rocks. The model does not require active fault slip on low‐angle faults. The flexural response to normal faulting is shown to be significantly affected by anelastic behavior of the crust and by loading due to sedimentation. The anelastic response to large bending stresses results in significant reduction in the effective elastic rigidity of the upper crust. This can explain the observed short wavelength of topographic response to normal fault loads. The model results in: (1) a nearly flat‐lying abandoned normal fault (or “detachment”) below slices of upper plate rocks and sedimentary infill; (2) a strong contrast in metamorphic grade across the abandoned “detachment”; (3) rapid movement of lower plate rocks from midcrustal depths to shallower depths. These results are qualitatively in agreement with geologic observations for core complexes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Lateral extrusion of lower crust from under high topography in the isostatic limit
Bird, P. (1991) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth · doi:10.1029/91jb00370 · Cited by 508
Rheology and strength of the lithosphere
Burov, E. B. (2011) · Marine and Petroleum Geology · doi:10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2011.05.008 · Cited by 470
Continental and oceanic core complexes
Whitney, D. L., Teyssier, C., Rey, P., & Buck, W. R. (2013) · Geological Society of America Bulletin · doi:10.1130/b30754.1 · Cited by 379
Self-citationCore complex mechanics: From the Gulf of Corinth to the Snake Range
Chéry, J. (2001) · Geology · doi:10.1130/0091-7613(2001)029<0439:ccmftg>2.0.co;2 · Cited by 313
Geologic evolution of the Lost City Hydrothermal Field
Denny, A. R., Kelley, D. S., & Früh‐Green, G. L. (2016) · Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems · doi:10.1002/2015gc005869 · Cited by 48
Metadata
- Authors
- Buck, W. R.
- Venue
- Tectonics
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1988-10
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 959-973
- ISSN
- 0278-7407 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-9194
- OpenAlex
- W2120055675
- Cited by
- 641
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: flexural rotation of normal faults. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/tc007i005p00959
- The paper
- Buck, W. R. (1988). flexural rotation of normal faults. Tectonics. https://doi.org/10.1029/tc007i005p00959
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.