The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A graphic procedure in the geochemical interpretation of water‐analyses
Abstract
This paper outlines certain fundamental principles in a graphic procedure which appears to be an effective tool in segregating analytical data for critical study with respect to sources of the dissolved constituents in waters, modifications in the character of a water as it passes through an area, and related geochemical problems. The procedure is based on a multiple‐trilinear diagram (Fig. 1) whose form has been evolved gradually and independently by the writer during the past several years through trial and modification of less comprehensive antecedent forms. Neither the diagram nor the procedure here described is a panacea for the easy solution of all geochemical problems. Many problems of interpretation can be answered only by intensive study of critical analytical data by other methods.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Winograd, I. J., & Thordarson, W. (1975) · Professional Paper · doi:10.3133/pp712c · Cited by 517
Khanoranga, & Khalid, S. (2019) · Journal of Geochemical Exploration · doi:10.1016/j.gexplo.2018.11.007 · Cited by 322
Sharif, M. U., Davis, R. K., Steele, K. F., Kim, B., Hays, P. D., Kresse, T. M., & Fazio, J. A. (2008) · Journal of Contaminant Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jconhyd.2008.03.001 · Cited by 40
Metadata
- Venue
- Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1944-06
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 914-928
- ISSN
- 0002-8606 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1971381271
- Cited by
- 5,593
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A graphic procedure in the geochemical interpretation of water‐analyses. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/tr025i006p00914
- The paper
- A graphic procedure in the geochemical interpretation of water‐analyses. (1944). Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union. https://doi.org/10.1029/tr025i006p00914
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
