The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Discordant uranium‐lead ages, I
Abstract
A graphical procedure is described for rapid calculation of discordant uraniumlead ages resulting from multiple episodes of uranium‐lead fractionation. A proof of the validity of this graphical procedure is given. The graphical procedure is extended to permit the calculation of the effect of the presence of primary radiogenic lead and of constant loss of intermediate daughter products.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Rutile and its applications in earth sciences
Meinhold, G. (2010) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2010.06.001 · Cited by 567
Age, origin, and thermal histories of some plutonic rocks from the Salinian block of California
Mattinson, J. M. (1978) · Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology · doi:10.1007/bf00381451 · Cited by 110
UPb ages for sphene in a contact metamorphic zone
Hanson, G. N., Catanzaro, E. J., & Anderson, D. H. (1971) · Earth and Planetary Science Letters · doi:10.1016/0012-821x(71)90082-3 · Cited by 35
Gascoyne, M. (1986) · Applied Geochemistry · doi:10.1016/0883-2927(86)90004-1 · Cited by 32
Isotopic Adventures—Geological, Planetological, and Cosmic
Wasserburg, G. J. (2003) · Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences · doi:10.1146/annurev.earth.31.100901.141409 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Venue
- Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1956-06
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 320-326
- ISSN
- 0002-8606 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2087425204
- Cited by
- 649
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Discordant uranium‐lead ages, I. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/tr037i003p00320
- The paper
- Discordant uranium‐lead ages, I. (1956). Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union. https://doi.org/10.1029/tr037i003p00320
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
