The DOI matches its Crossref record.
An integrated finite difference method for analyzing fluid flow in porous media
Open accessAbstract
The theoretical basis for the integrated finite difference method (IFDM) is presented to describe a powerful numerical technique for solving problems of groundwater flow in porous media. The method combines the advantages of an integral formulation with the simplicity of finite difference gradients and is very convenient for handling multidimensional heterogeneous systems composed of isotropic materials. Three illustrative problems are solved to demonstrate that two‐ and three‐dimensional problems are handled with equal ease. Comparison of IFDM with the well‐known finite element method (FEM) indicates that both are conceptually similar and differ mainly in the procedure adopted for measuring spatial gradients. The IFDM includes a simple criterion for local stability and an efficient explicit‐implicit iterative scheme for marching in the time domain. If such a scheme can be incorporated in a new version of FEM, it should be possible to develop an improved numerical technique that combines the inherent advantages of both methods.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Rutqvist, J., Wu, Y.-S., Tsang, C.-F., & Bodvarsson, G. (2002) · International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1365-1609(02)00022-9 · Cited by 936
Plant resistance to drought depends on timely stomatal closure
Martin‐StPaul, N., Delzon, S., & Cochard, H. (2017) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/ele.12851 · Cited by 820
Moridis, G. J., Kowalsky, M. B., & Pruess, K. (2012) · doi:10.2172/1173164 · Cited by 429
Xu, T., Spycher, N., Sonnenthal, E., Zhang, G., Zheng, L., & Pruess, K. (2011) · Computers & Geosciences · doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2010.10.007 · Cited by 417
Physically based modeling in catchment hydrology at 50: Survey and outlook
Paniconi, C., & Putti, M. (2015) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1002/2015wr017780 · Cited by 374
Metadata
- Authors
- Narasimhan, T. N., & Witherspoon, P. A.
- Venue
- Water Resources Research
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1976-02
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 57-64
- ISSN
- 0043-1397 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-7973
- OpenAlex
- W2063689517
- Cited by
- 663
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An integrated finite difference method for analyzing fluid flow in porous media. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/wr012i001p00057
- The paper
- Narasimhan, T. N., & Witherspoon, P. A. (1976). An integrated finite difference method for analyzing fluid flow in porous media. Water Resources Research. https://doi.org/10.1029/wr012i001p00057
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.