The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A stochastic‐conceptual analysis of rainfall‐runoff processes on a hillslope
Abstract
A stochastic‐conceptual mathematical model of hydrologie processes on a hillslope is utilized to investigate the influence of the spatial stochastic properties of the hillslope parameters on the statistical properties of the resulting runoff events. The model utilizes a stochastic rainfall generator and allows the generation of overland flow by both the Horton mechanism and the Dunne mechanism. Streamflow statistics are determined on the basis of an event‐based Monte Carlo simulation. The simulated hillslope runoff events are individually and statistically representative of actual runoff events reported in the literature from experimental watersheds. Results indicate that each of the parameters representing the spatial stochastic properties of the hydraulic conductivity distribution on a hillslope exerts an important influence on the statistical properties of runoff events arising from a hillslope under a given climatic regime. The mean value is the most important parameter; the standard deviation is quite important; the autocorrelation function is the least important. If one tries to represent a heterogeneous hillslope by an ‘equivalent’ homogeneous hillslope, the statistical properties of the predicted runoff generated from a given stochastic sequence of storm events may be greatly in error. Results of the simulations reported in this paper suggest that the distribution of hydraulic conductivities over a watershed should be included in parametric representations of the unit hydrograph, in conceptual predictions of flood exceedance probabilities, and in physically based assessments of the autocorrelation structure of the Streamflow sequences. Results of this study also infer a close relationship between climate, hydraulic conductivity, and geomorphic landform development.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Effects of Rainfall, Vegetation, and Microtopography on Infiltration and Runoff
Dunne, T., Zhang, W., & Aubry, B. F. (1991) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/91wr01585 · Cited by 561
Physically based modeling in catchment hydrology at 50: Survey and outlook
Paniconi, C., & Putti, M. (2015) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1002/2015wr017780 · Cited by 374
Seyfried, M. S., & Wilcox, B. P. (1995) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/94wr02025 · Cited by 304
Ebel, B. A., Rengers, F. K., & Tucker, G. E. (2016) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1002/2016wr019110 · Cited by 64
Metadata
- Authors
- Freeze, R. A.
- Venue
- Water Resources Research
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1980-04
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 391-408
- ISSN
- 0043-1397 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-7973
- OpenAlex
- W2109291873
- Cited by
- 271
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A stochastic‐conceptual analysis of rainfall‐runoff processes on a hillslope. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/wr016i002p00391
- The paper
- Freeze, R. A. (1980). A stochastic‐conceptual analysis of rainfall‐runoff processes on a hillslope. Water Resources Research. https://doi.org/10.1029/wr016i002p00391
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.