The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A distribution function approach to rainfall runoff modeling
Abstract
This paper begins with a critique of existing rainfall runoff models and proceeds to a largely new formulation in which the single store (representing, for example, interception of rainfall by vegetation, or retention of water in upper soil layers, or possibly both) is replaced by a statistical population of stores. The consequences of such an assumption are illustrated for the simplest, one‐parameter case in which the distribution of store depths is exponential. It is demonstrated that the use of a population of stores, even with but one parameter, can (1) afford a plausible description of the relation between actual evaporation and soil moisture deficit and (2) remove discontinuities of gradient in the objective function, optimization of which gives estimates of model parameters. The new formulation also permits observed runoff to be written down as a relatively simple function of past rainfall, potential evaporation, and the parameters in the statistical distribution of storages, with the consequence that gradient methods can be used to optimize the objective function in place of more time‐consuming direct search methods. An extension of the model to account for the translation of runoff to the basin outfall is accomplished by using a bivariate distribution of translation times and store depths. A simple recursive equation relating current flow to a proportion of the previous flow and an additive function of rainfall is obtained under the assumption that translation times and store depths are independent and exponentially distributed. More complex models are derived by relaxing the assumption of independence and by considering distributions other than exponential; expressions for two positively skewed density functions, the Weibull and gamma, are obtained. Series and parallel configurations of distribution function models are considered, and the relation of the models' elemental structure to different types of store commonly employed in conceptual modeling is discussed. The new formulation includes, as particular cases, all models based on linear systems theory. Application of the modeling approach to hourly values of flow, rainfall, and evapotranspiration from a number of the Institute of Hydrology's experimental basins results in very good model predictions of flows over the calibration period, with R2 values above 0.9. However, this level of performance as measured by the R2 statistic is not maintained over the test period, although quite reasonable predictions of the flood peaks are still obtained. The drop in performance is partly ascribed to the nature of the calibration period during which the basins were ‘wetting up’ after two years of relatively extreme drought. Model performance over the test period is improved by using a more realistic initial condition for the store contents but only at the expense of reduced R2 values in the calibration period. The need to assess the new model approach in a range of hydrological environments is recognised, especially where evapotranspiration forms an important component of the basin water balance and where the effects of soil moisture deficits on the generation of flood runoff can be expected to be greatest.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Simplex Method for Function Minimization
Nelder, J. A., & Mead, R. (1965) · The Computer Journal · doi:10.1093/comjnl/7.4.308 · Cited by 28,905
Powell, M. J. D. (1964) · The Computer Journal · doi:10.1093/comjnl/7.2.155 · Cited by 4,632
Cited by
LARGE AREA HYDROLOGIC MODELING AND ASSESSMENT PART I: MODEL DEVELOPMENT 1
Arnold, J. G., Srinivasan, R., Muttiah, R. S., & Williams, J. R. (1998) · JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association · doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.1998.tb05961.x · Cited by 7,945
Perrin, C., Michel, C., & Andréassian, V. (2001) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/s0022-1694(00)00393-0 · Cited by 632
The ARNO rainfall—runoff model
Todini, E. (1996) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/s0022-1694(96)80016-3 · Cited by 615
A land‐surface hydrology parameterization with subgrid variability for general circulation models
Wood, E. F., Lettenmaier, D. P., & Zartarian, V. G. (1992) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/91jd01786 · Cited by 586
Clark, M. P., Bierkens, M. F. P., Samaniego, L., Woods, R. A., Uijlenhoet, R., Bennett, K. E., Pauwels, V. R. N., Cai, X., Wood, A. W., & Peters-Lidard, C. D. (2017) · Hydrology and Earth System Sciences · doi:10.5194/hess-21-3427-2017 · Cited by 384
Metadata
- Authors
- Moore, R. J., & Clarke, R. T.
- Venue
- Water Resources Research
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1981-10
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1367-1382
- ISSN
- 0043-1397 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-7973
- OpenAlex
- W2003219601
- Cited by
- 217
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A distribution function approach to rainfall runoff modeling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/wr017i005p01367
- The paper
- Moore, R. J., & Clarke, R. T. (1981). A distribution function approach to rainfall runoff modeling. Water Resources Research. https://doi.org/10.1029/wr017i005p01367
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.