The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Techniques of trend analysis for monthly water quality data
Abstract
Some of the characteristics that complicate the analysis of water quality time series are non‐normal distributions, seasonality, flow relatedness, missing values, values below the limit of detection, and serial correlation. Presented here are techniques that are suitable in the face of the complications listed above for the exploratory analysis of monthly water quality data for monotonie trends. The first procedure described is a nonparametric test for trend applicable to data sets with seasonality, missing values, or values reported as ‘less than’: the seasonal Kendall test. Under realistic stochastic processes (exhibiting seasonality, skewness, and serial correlation), it is robust in comparison to parametric alternatives, although neither the seasonal Kendall test nor the alternatives can be considered an exact test in the presence of serial correlation. The second procedure, the seasonal Kendall slope estimator, is an estimator of trend magnitude. It is an unbiased estimator of the slope of a linear trend and has considerably higher precision than a regression estimator where data are highly skewed but somewhat lower precision where the data are normal. The third procedure provides a means for testing for change over time in the relationship between constituent concentration and flow, thus avoiding the problem of identifying trends in water quality that are artifacts of the particular sequence of discharges observed (e.g., drought effects). In this method a flow‐adjusted concentration is defined as the residual (actual minus conditional expectation) based on a regression of concentration on some function of discharge. These flow‐adjusted concentrations, which may also be seasonal and non‐normal, can then be tested for trend by using the seasonal Kendall test.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Changes in tropical cyclone number, duration, and intensity in a warming environment
Webster, P. J., Holland, G. J., Curry, J. A., & Chang, H.-R. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1116448 · Cited by 3,237
The influence of autocorrelation on the ability to detect trend in hydrological series
Yue, S., Pilon, P., Phinney, B., & Cavadias, G. (2002) · Hydrological Processes · doi:10.1002/hyp.1095 · Cited by 2,111
Detection of hydrologic trends and variability
Burn, D. H., & Hag Elnur, M. A. (2002) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/s0022-1694(01)00514-5 · Cited by 1,162
Kundzewicz, Z. W., & Robson, A. J. (2004) · Hydrological Sciences Journal · doi:10.1623/hysj.49.1.7.53993 · Cited by 580
Lefohn, A. S., Malley, C. S., Smith, L., Wells, B., Hazucha, M., Simon, H., Naik, V., Mills, G., Schultz, M. G., Paoletti, E., et al. (2018) · Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene · doi:10.1525/elementa.279 · Cited by 457
Metadata
- Authors
- Hirsch, R. M., Slack, J. R., & Smith, R. A.
- Venue
- Water Resources Research
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1982-02
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 107-121
- ISSN
- 0043-1397 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-7973
- OpenAlex
- W2137595065
- Cited by
- 2,934
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 22.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Techniques of trend analysis for monthly water quality data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/wr018i001p00107
- The paper
- Hirsch, R. M., Slack, J. R., & Smith, R. A. (1982). Techniques of trend analysis for monthly water quality data. Water Resources Research. https://doi.org/10.1029/wr018i001p00107
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.