Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 166

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

On subsurface stormflow: Predictions with simple kinematic theory for saturated and unsaturated flows

Beven, Keith·1982·Water Resources Research

Abstract

This paper provides analytical solutions for some simple cases of subsurface stormflow. The solutions are based on kinematic approximations in both unsaturated and saturated zones. Solutions for rising, falling, and partial equilibrium hydrographs are given. The analytical model has been applied to data collected on a hillslope of the East Twin Brook catchment, Mendip, United Kingdom. Measured and predicted hillslope hydrographs were in good agreement.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/wr018i006p01627

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 166

Metadata

Authors
Beven, K.
Venue
Water Resources Research
Published
1982-12
Volume
18
Issue
6
Pages
1627-1633
ISSN
  • 0043-1397 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-7973
OpenAlex
W2052662028
Cited by
166
References
2
FWCI
9.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On subsurface stormflow: Predictions with simple kinematic theory for saturated and unsaturated flows. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/wr018i006p01627
The paper
Beven, K. (1982). On subsurface stormflow: Predictions with simple kinematic theory for saturated and unsaturated flows. Water Resources Research. https://doi.org/10.1029/wr018i006p01627

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.