The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nonparametric Tests for Trend in Water Quality
Abstract
Recently, several nonparametric tests for trends in water quality have been proposed. These tests have been developed because the assumptions of classical parametric methods (i.e., normality, linearity, independence) are usually not met by typical water quality data. Additional idiosyncrasies of the data, such as missing values, censored data, and seasonality, compound the analysis problem. The nonparametric methods are more flexible and can handle these problems more easily. However, information on relative power of the various nonparametric procedures has not been reported in the hydrologic literature. For this reason, two classes of procedures, intrablock methods (procedures that compute a statistic, such as Kendall's tau, for each block or season and then sum these to produce a single overall statistic), and aligned rank methods (procedures that remove the block effect from each datum, sum the data over blocks, and then create a statistic from these sums) are examined in detail. Results from the statistical literature show that aligned rank methods are asymptotically more powerful than intrablock methods. In contrast, intrablock methods are more adaptable. Procedures to analyze more general models, including multistation designs and models, which include a trend‐season or trend‐site interaction, are developed by using Kendall's tau and intrablock methods. Finally, some recommendations on the analysis of data sets with missing values and multiple values per season values are presented.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data Via the EM Algorithm
Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1977.tb01600.x · Cited by 50,444
Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions
Fleiss, J. L., Levin, B., & Paik, M. C. (2003) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/0471445428 · Cited by 18,646
Cited by
Yue, S., Pilon, P., & Cavadias, G. (2002) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/s0022-1694(01)00594-7 · Cited by 2,072
Statistical Methods for Environmental Pollution Monitoring.
Lambert, D., & Gilbert, R. O. (1988) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2290180 · Cited by 2,066
Regional trends in aquatic recovery from acidification in North America and Europe
Stoddard, J. L., Jeffries, D. S., Lükewille, A., Clair, T. A., Dillon, P. J., Driscoll, C. T., Forsius, M., Johannessen, M., Kahl, J. S., Kellogg, J. H., et al. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/44114 · Cited by 909
Yue, S., & Pilon, P. (2004) · Hydrological Sciences Journal · doi:10.1623/hysj.49.1.21.53996 · Cited by 434
Statistical methods in water resources
(2002) · doi:10.3133/twri04a3 · Cited by 367
Metadata
- Authors
- van Belle, G., & Hughes, J. P.
- Venue
- Water Resources Research
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1984-01
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 127-136
- ISSN
- 0043-1397 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-7973
- OpenAlex
- W2032787940
- Cited by
- 401
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 11.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nonparametric Tests for Trend in Water Quality. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/wr020i001p00127
- The paper
- van Belle, G., & Hughes, J. P. (1984). Nonparametric Tests for Trend in Water Quality. Water Resources Research. https://doi.org/10.1029/wr020i001p00127
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.