The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Laboratory Studies of the Effects of the Capillary Fringe on Streamflow Generation
Abstract
This paper describes laboratory experiments that were conducted to investigate the groundwatersurface water interactions during the process of streamflow generation. In particular, the experiments were designed to examine the role of the capillary fringe in the runoff processes and its influence on the groundwater response to precipitation. The experimental results clearly show that if the zone of tension saturation extends to, or near, ground surface, the application of a small amount of water can cause an immediate rise in the water table, and the magnitude of the rise is much greater than would be expected on the basis of normal specific yield values for sandy materials. Because of the sloping surface of the laboratory model the rising water table caused the rapid generation of hydraulic gradients directed towards the toe of the slope (the stream) resulting in the immediate generation of groundwater discharge to the stream. Two experiments using chloride as a tracer and having rainfall rates of 4.3 and 1.9 cm h−1 showed that the discharge of preevent water to the stream preceded event water and that at early times, preevent water was the predominant component of streamflow. In addition, the results of the two tracer experiments show that the significance of preevent water increases with decreasing rainfall rate and that for the 1.9 cm h−1 rainfall rate preevent water was the main component of the stream hydrograph. The proportions of preevent and event water in the streamflow after steady conditions were reached were determined largely by the extent of the seepage face. This in turn would be determined by the hydraulic conductivity of the medium, the surface slope, and the rainfall intensity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Isotope hydrograph separations and rapid delivery of pre-event water from drainage basins
Buttle, J. M. (1994) · Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment · doi:10.1177/030913339401800102 · Cited by 535
Physically based modeling in catchment hydrology at 50: Survey and outlook
Paniconi, C., & Putti, M. (2015) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1002/2015wr017780 · Cited by 374
Ghasemizade, M., & Schirmer, M. (2013) · Environmental Earth Sciences · doi:10.1007/s12665-013-2329-8 · Cited by 36
Metadata
- Authors
- Abdul, A. S., & Gillham, R. W.
- Venue
- Water Resources Research
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1984-06
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 691-698
- ISSN
- 0043-1397 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-7973
- OpenAlex
- W2150338116
- Cited by
- 162
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 38.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Laboratory Studies of the Effects of the Capillary Fringe on Streamflow Generation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/wr020i006p00691
- The paper
- Abdul, A. S., & Gillham, R. W. (1984). Laboratory Studies of the Effects of the Capillary Fringe on Streamflow Generation. Water Resources Research. https://doi.org/10.1029/wr020i006p00691
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.