The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Estimation of Aquifer Parameters Under Transient and Steady State Conditions: 1. Maximum Likelihood Method Incorporating Prior Information
Abstract
In this series of three papers a method is presented to estimate the parameters of groundwater flow models under steady and nonsteady state conditions. The parameters include values and directions of principal hydraulic conductivities (or transmissivities) in anisotropic media, specific storage (or storativity), interior and boundary recharge or leakage rates, coefficients of head‐dependent interior and boundary sources, and boundary heads. In transient situations, the initial head distribution can also be estimated if the system is originally at a steady state. Paper 1 of the series discusses some of the advantage in treating the inverse problem statistically and in regularizing its solution by means of penalty criteria based on prior estimates of the parameters. The inverse problem is posed in the framework of maximum likelihood theory cast in a manner that accounts for prior information about the parameters. Since not all the factors which contribute to the prior errors can be quantified statistically at the outset, the covariance matrices of these errors are expressed in terms of several parameters which, if unknown, can be estimated jointly with the hydraulic parameters by a stagewise optimization process. When transient head data are separated by a fixed time interval, the temporal structure of these data is approximated by a lag‐one autoregressive model with a correlation coefficient that can be treated as another unknown parameter. Estimation errors are analyzed by examining the lower bound of their covariance matrix in the eigenspace. Paper 1 concludes by suggesting that certain model identification criteria developed in the time series literature, all of which are based on the maximum likelihood concept, might be useful for selecting the best groundwater model (or the best method of parameterizing a particular model) among a number of given alternatives.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A new look at the statistical model identification
Akaike, H. (1974) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.1974.1100705 · Cited by 51,879
Estimating the Dimension of a Model
Schwarz, G. (1978) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1176344136 · Cited by 47,033
An introduction to probability theory and its applications
(1958) · Journal of the Franklin Institute · doi:10.1016/0016-0032(58)90688-4 · Cited by 29,269
Modeling by shortest data description
Rissanen, J. (1978) · Automatica · doi:10.1016/0005-1098(78)90005-5 · Cited by 6,011
An Introduction to Probability Theory and its Applications.
Kingman, J. F. C., & Feller, W. (1972) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General) · doi:10.2307/2344620 · Cited by 4,938
Nonlinear Parameter Estimation
Chambers, J. M., & Bard, Y. (1975) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1268363 · Cited by 2,158
Nonlinear Parameter Estimation
Brubaker, T. A., & O'Keefe, K. R. (1979) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac50049a796 · Cited by 2,134
Theory and Application of the Linear Model.
Nelder, J. A., & Graybill, F. A. (1977) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General) · doi:10.2307/2344939 · Cited by 1,165
Theory and Application of the Linear Model.
Sen, P. K., & Graybill, F. A. (1978) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2286558 · Cited by 961
Delhomme, J. P. (1978) · Advances in Water Resources · doi:10.1016/0309-1708(78)90039-8 · Cited by 733
Cited by
A Reassessment of the Groundwater Inverse Problem
McLaughlin, D., & Townley, L. R. (1996) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/96wr00160 · Cited by 561
Physically based modeling in catchment hydrology at 50: Survey and outlook
Paniconi, C., & Putti, M. (2015) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1002/2015wr017780 · Cited by 374
Laloy, E., Rogiers, B., Vrugt, J. A., Mallants, D., & Jacques, D. (2013) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1002/wrcr.20226 · Cited by 264
A methodology to compute mixing ratios with uncertain end-members
Carrera, J., Vázquez‐Suñé, E., Castillo, O., & Sánchez‐Vila, X. (2004) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/2003wr002263 · Cited by 157
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Carrera, J., & Neuman, S. P.
- Venue
- Water Resources Research
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1986-02
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 199-210
- ISSN
- 0043-1397 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-7973
- OpenAlex
- W2057832688
- Cited by
- 871
- References
- 19
- FWCI
- 20.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Estimation of Aquifer Parameters Under Transient and Steady State Conditions: 1. Maximum Likelihood Method Incorporating Prior Information. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/wr022i002p00199
- The paper
- Carrera, J., & Neuman, S. P. (1986). Estimation of Aquifer Parameters Under Transient and Steady State Conditions: 1. Maximum Likelihood Method Incorporating Prior Information. Water Resources Research. https://doi.org/10.1029/wr022i002p00199
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.