Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 462

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Storm Runoff Generation in Humid Headwater Catchments: 1. Where Does the Water Come From?

Pearce, A. J., Stewart, M. K., Sklash, M. G.·1986·Water Resources Research

Abstract

Production of storm runoff in highly responsive catchments is not well understood. We report in these papers a comprehensive set of hydrometric and natural tracer data for rainfall, soil water, and streamflow for catchments in the Tawhai State Forest, Westland, New Zealand, which reveal some of the important runoff processes. The catchments are small (< 4 ha), with short (< 300 m) steep (average 34°) slopes and thin (< 1 m) permeable soils. Long‐term (1977–1980) weekly observations of oxygen 18, electrical conductivity, and chloride in the stream, groundwater, and rain in the main study catchment indicate that catchment outflow reflects a well‐mixed reservoir with a mean residence time of approximately 4 months. A preliminary storm hydrograph separation using oxygen 18 (for a storm hydrograph exceeded by only 22% of events since 1979) indicates that only 3% of storm runoff could be considered “new” (i.e., current storm) water. Rapid subsurface flow, such as macropore flow, of new water therefore cannot explain streamflow response in the study area. More detailed hydrograph separation studies on throughflow as well as streamflow are described in parts 2 (M. G. Sklash et. al., this issue) and 3 (M. G. Sklash et. al., unpublished manuscript, 1986).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/wr022i008p01263

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Pearce, A. J., Stewart, M. K., & Sklash, M. G.
Venue
Water Resources Research
Published
1986-08
Volume
22
Issue
8
Pages
1263-1272
ISSN
  • 0043-1397 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-7973
OpenAlex
W2107979199
Cited by
462
References
1
FWCI
25.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.