Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 169

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Streambank erosion along two rivers in Iowa

Odgaard, A. Jacob·1987·Water Resources Research

Abstract

Rates and processes of bank erosion were evaluated for reaches of two alluvial, equiwidth to wide bend, point bar streams in Iowa: East Nishnabotna River and Des Moines River. The evaluation was made using historical records (airphotos, maps, and streamflow records), field measurements, and soil analyses. The erosion rates were correlated with channel characteristics such as width, depth, curvature, arc angle of channel centerline, channel slope, friction factor, and degree of vegetation on the banks. The correlation was studied using a meander flow model developed by the author. The meander flow model simulated the velocity distribution in the bends and the location of the erosion occurrences. Estimates were made of total sediment influx to the rivers from cutbank erosion.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/wr023i007p01225

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 169

Metadata

Authors
Odgaard, A. J.
Venue
Water Resources Research
Published
1987-07
Volume
23
Issue
7
Pages
1225-1236
ISSN
  • 0043-1397 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-7973
OpenAlex
W2166392607
Cited by
169
References
0
FWCI
6.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Streambank erosion along two rivers in Iowa. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/wr023i007p01225
The paper
Odgaard, A. J. (1987). Streambank erosion along two rivers in Iowa. Water Resources Research. https://doi.org/10.1029/wr023i007p01225

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.