The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Estimation of descriptive statistics for multiply censored water quality data
Abstract
This paper extends the work of Gilliom and Helsel (1986) on procedures for estimating descriptive statistics of water quality data that contain “less than” observations. Previously, procedures were evaluated when only one detection limit was present. Here we investigate the performance of estimators for data that have multiple detection limits. Probability plotting and maximum likelihood methods perform substantially better than simple substitution procedures now commonly in use. Therefore simple substitution procedures (e.g., substitution of the detection limit) should be avoided. Probability plotting methods are more robust than maximum likelihood methods to misspecification of the parent distribution and their use should be encouraged in the typical situation where the parent distribution is unknown. When utilized correctly, less than values frequently contain nearly as much information for estimating population moments and quantiles as would the same observations had the detection limit been below them.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Simplified estimators for the normal distribution when samples are singly censored or truncated
Cohen, A. C. (1959) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1959.10489859 · Cited by 425
Cited by
Management of left‐censored data in dietary exposure assessment of chemical substances
Authority, E. F. S. (2010) · EFSA Journal · doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2010.1557 · Cited by 580
Helsel, D. R. (2006) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.04.051 · Cited by 505
Self-citationCohn, T. A., Caulder, D. L., Gilroy, E. J., Zynjuk, L. D., & Summers, R. M. (1992) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/92wr01008 · Cited by 435
Self-citationChemical characterization of urban stormwater: traditional and emerging contaminants
Pamuru, S. T., Forgione, E., Croft, K., Kjellerup, B. V., & Davis, A. P. (2022) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151887 · Cited by 120
Metadata
- Authors
- Helsel, D. R., & Cohn, T. A.
- Venue
- Water Resources Research
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1988-12
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1997-2004
- ISSN
- 0043-1397 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-7973
- OpenAlex
- W1964355674
- Cited by
- 327
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Estimation of descriptive statistics for multiply censored water quality data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/wr024i012p01997
- The paper
- Helsel, D. R., & Cohn, T. A. (1988). Estimation of descriptive statistics for multiply censored water quality data. Water Resources Research. https://doi.org/10.1029/wr024i012p01997
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.