Cited by 582Soil erosion and sediment transportHydrology and Sediment Transport ProcessesGroundwater and Watershed Analysis

Source areas, drainage density, and channel initiation

Montgomery, David R., Dietrich, William E.·1989·Water Resources Research

Abstract

An analysis of channel head locations provides insight into controls on drainage density, the response of landscapes to climatic change, and the delineation of source areas for channel network simulations. Channel heads and colluvial deposits were mapped in a roughly 2 km 2 area near San Francisco, California, and, although channel heads are located within colluvial deposits in hollows, many such deposits do not support channel heads. Channel heads were classified as either gradual or abrupt. For either type of channel head, the channel reach immediately downslope may be contiguous with the channel network or may consist of a series of short discontinuous channel segments. The local valley slope at the channel head is inversely related to both source area and source‐basin length as well as to the contributing area per unit contour length at the channel head. In contrast, valley slope does not vary with drainage area upslope of channel heads. Field observations and a similarity between predicted and observed area‐slope relations suggest that the location of channel heads on steep slopes may be controlled by subsurface flow‐induced instability of the colluvial fill. Preliminary field observations also suggest that abrupt channel heads on gentle slopes are controlled by seepage erosion, whereas gradual channel head locations appear to be governed by saturation overland flow. Consideration of the geometric relationship between source areas and the first‐order drainages that contain them results in an inverse relation between mean source‐basin length and drainage density.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/wr025i008p01907

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Montgomery, D. R., & Dietrich, W. E.
Affiliations
University of California, Berkeley (US)
Venue
Water Resources Research
Published
1989-08
Volume
25
Issue
8
Pages
1907-1918
ISSN
  • 0043-1397 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-7973
OpenAlex
W1984740974
Cited by
582
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 18
FWCI
10.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Water Resources Research (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation (8451175)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil erosion and sediment transport
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Groundwater and Watershed Analysis
Keywords
channel heads, drainage density, source regions, colluvium, channel initiation, valley slopes, seepage erosion, saturation overland flow, San Francisco

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review