Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 414

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Fractal processes in soil water retention

Tyler, Scott W., Wheatcraft, Stephen W.·1990·Water Resources Research

Abstract

Numerous empirical models exist for soil water retention and unsaturated hydraulic conductivity data. It has generally been recognized that the empirical fitting coefficients in these models are somehow related to soil texture. However, the fact that they are empirical means that elaborate laboratory experiments must be performed for each soil to obtain values for the parameters. Moreover, empirical models do not shed insight into the fundamental physical principles that govern the processes of unsaturated flow and drainage. We propose a physical conceptual model for soil texture and pore structure that is based on the concept of fractal geometry. The motivation for a fractal model of soil texture is that some particle size distributions in granular soils have already been shown to display self‐similar scaling that is typical of fractal objects. Hence it is reasonable to expect that pore size distributions may also display fractal scaling properties. The paradigm that we use for the soil pore size distribution is the Sierpinski carpet, which is a fractal that contains self similar “holes” (or pores) over a wide range of scales. We evaluate the water retention properties of regular and random Sierpinski carpets and relate these properties directly to the Brooks and Corey (or Campbell) empirical water retention model. We relate the water retention curves directly to the fractal dimension of the Sierpinski carpet and show that the fractal dimension strongly controls the water retention properties of the Sierpinski carpet “soil”. Higher fractal dimensions are shown to mimic clay‐type soils, with very slow dewatering characteristics and relatively low fractal dimensions are shown to mimic a sandy soil with relatively rapid dewatering characteristics. Our fractal model of soil water retention removes the empirical fitting parameters from the soil water retention models and provides parameters (fractal dimension) which are intrinsic to the nature of the fractal porous structure. The relative permeability functions of Burdine and Mualem are also shown to be fractal directly from fractal water retention results.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/wr026i005p01047

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 12 references

Cited by

See all 414

Metadata

Authors
Tyler, S. W., & Wheatcraft, S. W.
Venue
Water Resources Research
Published
1990-05
Volume
26
Issue
5
Pages
1047-1054
ISSN
  • 0043-1397 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-7973
OpenAlex
W1982364331
Cited by
414
References
12
FWCI
50.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fractal processes in soil water retention. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/wr026i005p01047
The paper
Tyler, S. W., & Wheatcraft, S. W. (1990). Fractal processes in soil water retention. Water Resources Research. https://doi.org/10.1029/wr026i005p01047

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.