The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A general mass‐conservative numerical solution for the unsaturated flow equation
Abstract
Numerical approximations based on different forms of the governing partial differential equation can lead to significantly different results for unsaturated flow problems. Numerical solution based on the standard h‐based form of Richards equation generally yields poor results, characterized by large mass balance errors and erroneous estimates of infiltration depth. Conversely, numerical solutions based on the mixed form of Richards equation can be shown to possess the conservative property, so that mass is perfectly conserved. This leads to significant improvement in numerical solution performance, while requiring no additional computational effort. However, use of the mass‐conservative method does not guarantee good solutions. Accurate solution of the unsaturated flow equation also requires use of a diagonal time (or mass) matrix. Only when diagonal time matrices are used can the solution be shown to obey a maximum principle, which guarantees smooth, nonoscillatory infiltration profiles. This highlights the fact that proper treatment of the time derivative is critical in the numerical solution of unsaturated flow.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Modeling Soil Processes: Review, Key Challenges, and New Perspectives
Vereecken, H., Schnepf, A., Hopmans, J. W., Javaux, M., Or, D., Roose, T., Vanderborght, J., Young, M. H., Amelung, W., Aitkenhead, M., et al. (2016) · Vadose Zone Journal · doi:10.2136/vzj2015.09.0131 · Cited by 833
A fully coupled physically-based spatially-distributed model for evaluating surface/subsurface flow
Panday, S., & Huyakorn, P. S. (2004) · Advances in Water Resources · doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2004.02.016 · Cited by 503
Towards a comprehensive assessment of model structural adequacy
Gupta, H. V., Clark, M. P., Vrugt, J. A., Abramowitz, G., & Ye, M. (2012) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/2011wr011044 · Cited by 466
Therrien, R., & Sudicky, E. A. (1996) · Journal of Contaminant Hydrology · doi:10.1016/0169-7722(95)00088-7 · Cited by 462
Implementing Plant Hydraulics in the Community Land Model, Version 5
Kennedy, D., Swenson, S., Oleson, K. W., Lawrence, D. M., Fisher, R., Lola da Costa, A. C., & Gentine, P. (2019) · Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems · doi:10.1029/2018ms001500 · Cited by 432
Metadata
- Authors
- Celia, M. A., Bouloutas, E. T., & Zarba, R. L.
- Venue
- Water Resources Research
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1990-07
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1483-1496
- ISSN
- 0043-1397 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-7973
- OpenAlex
- W2099370652
- Cited by
- 1,774
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 93.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A general mass‐conservative numerical solution for the unsaturated flow equation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/wr026i007p01483
- The paper
- Celia, M. A., Bouloutas, E. T., & Zarba, R. L. (1990). A general mass‐conservative numerical solution for the unsaturated flow equation. Water Resources Research. https://doi.org/10.1029/wr026i007p01483
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.