The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cow's milk allergy: diagnostic accuracy of skin prick and patch tests and specific IgE
Abstract
Background: The objective of the present study was to evaluate the relevance of skin tests and the concentration of cow's milk‐specific IgE antibodies in correlation with oral cow's milk challenge in infants with suspected cow's milk allergy. Methods: The study material comprised 143 infants under the age of 2 years who had undergone a diagnostic elimination challenge because of suspected cow's milk allergy in 1996. Cow's milk‐specific IgE was measured, and skin prick and patch tests were performed. Results: Of the 143 oral cow's milk challenges performed, 72 (50%) were positive. Of the positive reactions, 22 involved immediate‐type reactions. In 50 patients, delayed‐onset reactions of eczematous or gastrointestinal type appeared. Of the infants with challenge‐proven cow's milk allergy, 26% showed elevated IgE concentrations to cow's milk, 14% had a positive skin prick test, and 44% had a positive patch test for cow's milk. Interestingly, in most patch test‐positive patients, the prick test for cow's milk was negative. Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that many patients with a negative prick test result had a positive patch test to cow's milk. The patch test was a more sensitive method than the prick test or RAST to detect cow's milk allergy in this study population. Our results indicate that patch testing will significantly increase the probability of early detection of cow's milk allergy. Confirmation of the diagnosis is essential in patients with negative test results but a clinical suspicion of food allergy, and in patch test‐positive patients. For this purpose, the most reliable method is the elimination‐challenge procedure.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The use of skin prick tests and patch tests to identify causative foods in eosinophilic esophagitis
Spergel, J. M., Beausoleil, J. L., Mascarenhas, M., & Liacouras, C. A. (2002) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1067/mai.2002.121458 · Cited by 517
Allergen-responsive CD4+CD25+ Regulatory T Cells in Children who Have Outgrown Cow's Milk Allergy
Karlsson, M. R., Rugtveit, J., & Brandtzaeg, P. (2004) · The Journal of Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.20032121 · Cited by 506
14 Years of Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Clinical Features and Prognosis
Spergel, J. M., Brown‐Whitehorn, T. F., Beausoleil, J. L., Franciosi, J., Shuker, M., Verma, R., & Liacouras, C. A. (2009) · Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition · doi:10.1097/mpg.0b013e3181788282 · Cited by 467
Spergel, J. M., Andrews, T., Brown-Whitehorn, T. F., Beausoleil, J. L., & Liacouras, C. A. (2005) · Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology · doi:10.1016/s1081-1206(10)61151-9 · Cited by 465
The challenge of cow milk protein allergy
El-Agamy, E. I. (2007) · Small Ruminant Research · doi:10.1016/j.smallrumres.2006.09.016 · Cited by 317
Metadata
- Authors
- Majamaa, H., Moisio, P., Kautiainen, H., Majamaa, H., Turjanmaa, K., & Holm, K.
- Venue
- Allergy
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1999-04
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 346-351
- ISSN
- 0105-4538 (ISSN-L)
- 1398-9995
- OpenAlex
- W2146185033
- Cited by
- 164
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cow's milk allergy: diagnostic accuracy of skin prick and patch tests and specific IgE. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1034/j.1398-9995.1999.00834.x
- The paper
- Majamaa, H., Moisio, P., Kautiainen, H., Majamaa, H., Turjanmaa, K., & Holm, K. (1999). Cow's milk allergy: diagnostic accuracy of skin prick and patch tests and specific IgE. Allergy. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1398-9995.1999.00834.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.