The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The atopy patch test (APT) – a useful tool for the diagnosis of food allergy in children with atopic dermatitis
Abstract
Background: While immediate‐type clinical reactions to food can quite easily be identified by history or measurement of specific IgE in combination with positive oral food challenges, the evaluation of food allergy in the absence of immediate clinical reactions still presents diagnostic difficulties – particularly in children with atopic dermatitis. The objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of the atopy patch test (APT) with regard to late‐phase reactions observed in double‐blind, placebo‐controlled food challenges with cow's milk, hen's egg, wheat, and soybean. Methods: We investigated 75 children (median age 2.1 years) with suspected food allergy by double‐blind, placebo‐controlled food challenges, specific IgE in serum, skin prick test, and APT. Of the subjects, 69/75 suffered from atopic dermatitis. Results: Of 209 oral challenges, 133 were performed with allergen and 76 with placebo. We assessed 77/133 allergen and 2/76 placebo challenges as positive. In 66 of 77 (86%) positive oral challenges, specific IgE in serum to the corresponding allergen was positive; in 64/77 (83%) the skin prick test, and in 42/77 (55%) the APT was positive. While immediate‐type reactions were associated with positive skin prick test and proof of specific IgE in serum, late‐phase clinical reactions were associated with a positive APT (sensitivity 76%, specificity 95%). Conclusions: The APT seems to be a valuable additional tool in the diagnostic work‐up of food allergy in children with atopic dermatitis – especially with regard to late‐phase clinical reactions. The APT may help to prevent unnecessary restrictive diets which may be the consequence of misjudging late reactions by clinical assessment alone.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Wollenberg, A., Barbarot, S., Bieber, T., Christen‐Zaech, S., Deleuran, M., Fink‐Wagner, A., Gieler, U., Girolomoni, G., Lau, S., Muraro, A., et al. (2018) · Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology · doi:10.1111/jdv.14891 · Cited by 1,181
Review article: the diagnosis and management of food allergy and food intolerances
Turnbull, J. L., Adams, H. N., & Gorard, D. A. (2015) · Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1111/apt.12984 · Cited by 306
Allergic cross‐reactivity: from gene to the clinic
Ferreira, F., Hawranek, T., Gruber, P., Wopfner, N., & Mari, A. (2004) · Allergy · doi:10.1046/j.1398-9995.2003.00407.x · Cited by 194
Dichotomy of food and inhalant allergen sensitization in eosinophilic esophagitis
Sugnanam, K. K. N., Collins, J. T., Smith, P. K., Connor, F., Lewindon, P., Cleghorn, G., & Withers, G. (2007) · Allergy · doi:10.1111/j.1398-9995.2007.01454.x · Cited by 112
Second-Generation Antihistamines: Actions and Efficacy in the Management of Allergic Disorders
Golightly, L. K., & Greos, L. S. (2005) · Drugs · doi:10.2165/00003495-200565030-00004 · Cited by 111
Metadata
- Authors
- Niggemann, B., Reibel, S., & Wahn, U.
- Venue
- Allergy
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-03
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 281-285
- ISSN
- 0105-4538 (ISSN-L)
- 1398-9995
- OpenAlex
- W2033226130
- Cited by
- 263
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The atopy patch test (APT) – a useful tool for the diagnosis of food allergy in children with atopic dermatitis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1034/j.1398-9995.2000.00464.x
- The paper
- Niggemann, B., Reibel, S., & Wahn, U. (2000). The atopy patch test (APT) – a useful tool for the diagnosis of food allergy in children with atopic dermatitis. Allergy. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1398-9995.2000.00464.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.