Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 304

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cross‐reactivity of IgE antibodies to allergens

Open access
Aalberse, R. C., Akkerdaas, J., Van Ree, R.·2001·Allergy

Abstract

The cross‐reactivity of IgE antibodies is of interest for various reasons, three of which are discussed. Firstly, from the clinical view, it is important to know the patterns of cross‐reactivity, because they often (but not always) reflect the pattern of clinical sensitivities. We discuss the cross‐reactivities associated with sensitization to pollen and vegetable foods: PR‐10 (Bet v 1‐related), profilin, the cross‐reactive carbohydrate determinant (CCD), the recently described isoflavone reductase, and the (still elusive) mugwort allergen that is associated with celery anaphylaxis; cross‐reactivities between allergens from invertebrates, particularly tropomyosin, paramyosin, and glutathione S‐transferase (GST); and latex‐associated cross‐reactivities. Clustering cross‐reactive allergens may simplify diagnostic procedures and therapeutic regimens. Secondly, IgE cross‐reactivity is of interest for its immunologic basis, particularly in relation to the regulation of allergic sensitization: are IgE antibodies to allergens more often cross‐reactive than IgG antibodies to “normal” antigens? If so, why? For this discussion, it is relevant to compare not only the structural relation between the two allergens in question, but also the relatedness to the human equivalent (if any) and how the latter influences the immune repertoire. Thirdly, prediction of IgE cross‐reactivity is of interest in relation to allergic reactivity to novel foods. Cross‐reactivity is a property defined by individual antibodies to individual allergens. Quantitative information (including relative affinity) is required on cross‐reactivity in the allergic population and with specific allergens (rather than with whole extracts). Such information is still scarce, but with the increasing availability of purified (usually recombinant) allergens, such quantitative information will soon start to accumulate. It is expected that similarity in short stretches of the linear amino‐acid sequence is unlikely to result in relevant cross‐reactivity between two proteins unless there is similarity in the protein fold.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1034/j.1398-9995.2001.056006478.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 304

Metadata

Authors
Aalberse, R. C., Akkerdaas, J., & Van Ree, R.
Venue
Allergy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001-06
Volume
56
Issue
6
Pages
478-490
ISSN
  • 0105-4538 (ISSN-L)
  • 1398-9995
OpenAlex
W2031854599
Cited by
304
References
1
FWCI
5.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.