The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The cellular composition of induced sputum in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Abstract
Asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease are characterized by airway inflammation, which can be assessed by bronchoscopic techniques as well as by the analysis of induced sputum. A method to induce sputum with inhaled hypertonic saline was adapted for use in 21 chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients (mean baseline forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) 1.60 L, or 54% predicted) and in 16 healthy volunteers. The success rate and safety of the method, were investigated along with the reproducibility of cell counts and differences in cell counts between both groups. All subjects produced adequate samples and the procedure did not alter spirometric values. A marked sputum neutrophilia was noted in patients with COPD (74.9+/-4.7%), whereas mainly macrophages were seen in healthy volunteers (74.0+/-4.0%). Reliability of the cell counts was high, both within investigators (r=0.99 neutrophils, r=0.99 macrophages) and between investigators (r=0.95 neutrophils, r=0.77 macrophages). In patients with COPD, an inverse correlation was noted between percentage of neutrophils and FEV1 (r(s)=-0.48, p<0.05). Immunostaining revealed a large proportion of activated macrophages in both groups. It was concluded that induction of sputum is a safe and reproducible method to study the composition of airway secretions in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT
Martin Bland, J., & Altman, D. (1986) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(86)90837-8 · Cited by 47,965
Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement
Bland, J. M., & Altman, D. G. (2010) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.10.001 · Cited by 5,220
Cited by
Vestbo, J., Hurd, S. S., Agustí, A. G., Jones, P. W., Vogelmeier, C., Anzueto, A., Barnes, P. J., Fabbri, L. M., Martinez, F. J., Nishimura, M., et al. (2013) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.201204-0596pp · Cited by 15,983
Mediators of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Barnes, P. J. (2004) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1124/pr.56.4.2 · Cited by 710
Oxidative stress and airway inflammation in severe exacerbations of COPD
Drost, E. M. (2005) · Thorax · doi:10.1136/thx.2004.027946 · Cited by 389
Progress in the mechanism and targeted drug therapy for COPD
Wang, C., Zhou, J., Wang, J., Li, S., Fukunaga, A., Yodoi, J., & Tian, H. (2020) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-020-00345-x · Cited by 303
Inflammatory cells in the airways in COPD
O'Donnell, R. (2006) · Thorax · doi:10.1136/thx.2004.024463 · Cited by 217
Metadata
- Authors
- Peleman, R. A., Rytilä, P. H., Kips, J. C., Joos, G. F., & Pauwels, R. A.
- Venue
- European Respiratory Journal
- Publisher
- European Respiratory Society (ERS)
- Published
- 1999-04
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 839
- ISSN
- 0903-1936 (ISSN-L)
- 1399-3003
- OpenAlex
- W2130052573
- Cited by
- 170
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The cellular composition of induced sputum in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1034/j.1399-3003.1999.13d24.x
- The paper
- Peleman, R. A., Rytilä, P. H., Kips, J. C., Joos, G. F., & Pauwels, R. A. (1999). The cellular composition of induced sputum in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. European Respiratory Journal. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-3003.1999.13d24.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.