Cited by 135Allergic Rhinitis and SensitizationSinusitis and nasal conditionsAsthma and respiratory diseases

Hypersaline nasal irrigation in children with symptomatic seasonal allergic rhinitis: a randomized study

Garavello, Werner, Romagnoli, Marco, Sordo, Lorenza, Gaini, Renato Maria, Berardino, Cristina Di, Angrisano, Alfonso·2003·Pediatric Allergy and Immunology

Abstract

Recent evidence suggests that nasal irrigation with hypertonic saline may be useful as an adjunctive treatment modality in the management of many sinonasal diseases. However, no previous studies have investigated the efficacy of this regimen in the prevention of seasonal allergic rhinitis-related symptoms in the pediatric patient. Twenty children with seasonal allergic rhinitis to Parietaria were enrolled in the study. Ten children were randomized to receive three-times daily nasal irrigation with hypertonic saline for the entire pollen season, which had lasted 6 weeks. Ten patients were allocated to receive no nasal irrigation and were used as controls. A mean daily rhinitis score based on the presence of nasal itching, rhinorrea, nasal obstruction and sneezing was calculated for each week of the pollen season. Moreover, patients were allowed to use oral antihistamines when required and the mean number of drug assumption per week was also calculated. In patients allocated to nasal irrigation, the mean daily rhinitis score was reduced during 5 weeks of the study period. This reduction was statistically significantly different in the 3th, 4th and 5th week of therapy. Moreover, a decreased consumption of oral antihistamines was observed in these patients. This effect became evident after the second week of treatment and resulted in statistically significant differences during the 3th, 4th and 6th week. This study supports the use of nasal irrigation with hypertonic saline in th…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1034/j.1399-3038.2003.00021.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is evidence for the effectiveness of nasal saline irrigation for chronic sinusitis and allergic rhinitis.

    “There is evidence for the effectiveness of nasal saline irrigation for chronic sinusitis (Rabago 2002) and allergic rhinitis (Garavello 2003).”

    From Saline nasal irrigation for acute upper respiratory tract infections (2015) · cites this paper as Garavello 2003

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Garavello, W., Romagnoli, M., Sordo, L., Gaini, R. M., Berardino, C. D., & Angrisano, A.
Affiliations
University of Milano-Bicocca (IT)
Venue
Pediatric Allergy and Immunology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-04
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
140-143
ISSN
  • 0905-6157 (ISSN-L)
  • 1399-3038
OpenAlex
W2158398730
Cited by
135
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 12
FWCI
2.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pediatric Allergy and Immunology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BOA (University of Milano-Bicocca) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Immunology and Allergy › Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Otorhinolaryngology › Sinusitis and nasal conditions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
Keywords
allergic rhinitis, children, pollen season, rhinitis symptom scores, antihistamine use, adjunctive therapy
MeSH terms
Administration, Intranasal, Allergens, Child, Female, Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal, Humans, Therapeutic Irrigation, Male, Nasal Cavity, Pollen, Saline Solution, Hypertonic, Treatment Outcome, Parietaria

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review