Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 448

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Response of the cultivated tomato and its wild salt‐tolerant relative Lycopersiconpennellii to salt‐dependent oxidative stress: The root antioxidative system

Shalata, Abed, Mittova, Valentina, Volokita, Micha, Guy, Micha, Tal, Moshe·2001·Physiologia Plantarum
DOI 10.1034/j.1399-3054.2001.1120405.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The response of the antioxidant system to salt stress was studied in the roots of the cultivated tomato Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. cv. M82 (Lem) and its wild salt‐tolerant relative L. pennellii (Corr.) D'Arcy accession Atico (Lpa). Roots of control and salt (100 m M NaCl)‐stressed plants were sampled at various times after commencement of salinization. A gradual increase in the membrane lipid peroxidation in salt‐stressed root of Lem was accompanied with decreased activities of the antioxidant enzymes: superoxide dismutase (SOD; EC 1.15.1.1), catalase (CAT; EC 1.11.1.6), ascorbate peroxidase (APX; EC 1.11.1.11) and decreased contents of the antioxidants ascorbate and glutathione and their redox states. In contrast, increased activities of the SOD, CAT, APX, monodehydroascorbate reductase (MDHAR; EC 1.6.5.4), and increased contents of the reduced forms of ascorbate and glutathione and their redox states were found in salt‐stressed roots of Lpa, in which the level of membrane lipid peroxidation remained unchanged. It seems that the better protection of Lpa roots from salt‐induced oxidative damage results, at least partially, from the increased activity of their antioxidative system.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1034/j.1399-3054.2001.1120405.x

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 39 references

Cited by

See all 448

Metadata

Authors
Shalata, A., Mittova, V., Volokita, M., Guy, M., & Tal, M.
Venue
Physiologia Plantarum
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001-08
Volume
112
Issue
4
Pages
487-494
ISSN
  • 0031-9317 (ISSN-L)
  • 1399-3054
DOI
10.1034/j.1399-3054.2001.1120405.x
OpenAlex
W2046376821
Cited by
448
References
39
FWCI
12.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Response of the cultivated tomato and its wild salt‐tolerant relative Lycopersiconpennellii to salt‐dependent oxidative stress: The root antioxidative system. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1034/j.1399-3054.2001.1120405.x
The paper
Shalata, A., Mittova, V., Volokita, M., Guy, M., & Tal, M. (2001). Response of the cultivated tomato and its wild salt‐tolerant relative Lycopersiconpennellii to salt‐dependent oxidative stress: The root antioxidative system. Physiologia Plantarum. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-3054.2001.1120405.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.