The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Salt stress induces up‐regulation of an efficient chloroplast antioxidant system in the salt‐tolerant wild tomato species Lycopersicon pennellii but not in the cultivated species
Abstract
The response of the chloroplastic antioxidant system of the cultivated tomato Lycopersicon esculentum (Lem) and its wild salt‐tolerant related species L. pennellii (Lpa) to NaCl stress was studied. An increase in H 2 O 2 level and membrane lipid peroxidation was observed in chloroplasts of salt‐stressed Lem. In contrast, a decrease in these indicators of oxidative stress characterized chloroplasts of salt‐stressed Lpa plants. This differential response of Lem and Lpa to salinity, correlates with the activities of the antioxidative enzymes in their chloroplasts. Increased activities of total superoxide dismutase (SOD), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), monodehydroascorbate reductase (MDHAR), glutathione‐S‐transferase (GST), phospholipid hydroperoxide glutathione peroxidase (PHGPX) and several isoforms of non‐specific peroxidases (POD) were found in chloroplasts of salt‐treated Lpa plants. In these chloroplasts, in contrast, activity of lipoxygenase (LOX) decreased while in those of salt‐stressed Lem it increased. Although total SOD activity slightly increased in chloroplasts of salt‐treated Lem plants, differentiation between SOD types revealed that only stromal Cu/ZnSOD activity increased. In contrast, in chloroplasts of salt‐treated Lpa plants FeSOD activity increased while Cu/ZnSOD activity remained unchanged. These data indicate that salt‐dependent oxidative stress and damage, suffered by Lem chloroplasts, was effectively alleviated in Lpa chloroplasts by the selective up‐regulation of a set of antioxidative enzymes. Further support for the above idea was supplied by leaf discs experiments in which pre‐exposure of Lpa plants to salt‐treatment conferred cross‐tolerance to paraquat‐induced oxidative stress while increased oxidative damage by paraquat‐treatment was found in salt‐stressed Lem plants.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hernández, J. A., Jiménez, A., Mullineaux, P., & Sevilia, F. (2000) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1046/j.1365-3040.2000.00602.x · Cited by 837
Cited by
Salt tolerance and salinity effects on plants: a review
Parida, A. K., & Das, A. B. (2005) · Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2004.06.010 · Cited by 4,160
de Azevedo Neto, A. D., Prisco, J. T., Enéas-Filho, J., Abreu, C. E. B. D., & Gomes-Filho, E. (2006) · Environmental and Experimental Botany · doi:10.1016/j.envexpbot.2005.01.008 · Cited by 920
Salt stress and phyto-biochemical responses of plants - a review
Parvaiz, A., & Satyawati, S. (2008) · Plant, Soil and Environment · doi:10.17221/2774-pse · Cited by 577
Koca, H., Bor, M., Özdemir, F., & Türkan, İ. (2007) · Environmental and Experimental Botany · doi:10.1016/j.envexpbot.2006.12.005 · Cited by 537
A New Insight of Salt Stress Signalingin Plant
Park, H. J., Kim, W.-Y., & Yun, D.-J. (2016) · Molecules and Cells · doi:10.14348/molcells.2016.0083 · Cited by 377
Metadata
- Authors
- Mittova, V., Tal, M., Volokita, M., & Guy, M.
- Venue
- Physiologia Plantarum
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-06-25
- Volume
- 115
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 393-400
- ISSN
- 0031-9317 (ISSN-L)
- 1399-3054
- OpenAlex
- W2163990052
- Cited by
- 243
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Salt stress induces up‐regulation of an efficient chloroplast antioxidant system in the salt‐tolerant wild tomato species Lycopersicon pennellii but not in the cultivated species. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1034/j.1399-3054.2002.1150309.x
- The paper
- Mittova, V., Tal, M., Volokita, M., & Guy, M. (2002). Salt stress induces up‐regulation of an efficient chloroplast antioxidant system in the salt‐tolerant wild tomato species Lycopersicon pennellii but not in the cultivated species. Physiologia Plantarum. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-3054.2002.1150309.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.