CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 117Bipolar Disorder and TreatmentSchizophrenia research and treatmentMental Health Research Topics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Social support in bipolar disorder: its relevance to remission and relapse

Johnson, Lars, Lundström, Ola, Åberg‐Wistedt, Anna, Mathé, Aleksander A·2003·Bipolar Disorders
DOI 10.1034/j.1399-5618.2003.00021.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Objectives: While an association between low‐level social support and depression has been found in many studies, its relevance in bipolar illness has been rarely investigated. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of social support in the remission and relapse of bipolar disorder. Methods: We obtained ratings from 94 stabilized bipolar patients using two different questionnaires that measure perceived social support: the Interview Schedule for Social Interaction and the Interpersonal Support Evaluation List. Results: Significantly lower social support was found in patients in partial recovery compared with those in full recovery (p = 0.003). Patients who relapsed during a 1‐year prospective follow‐up period perceived a significantly lower level of social support than patients with no relapse (p = 0.012). Conclusions: Bipolar patients with full interepisode remission perceive more social support than those who do not achieve full remission. Poor social support may increase the risk of relapse in bipolar disorder.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1034/j.1399-5618.2003.00021.x

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Clayton P, 1977, Personal Resources Inventory (PRI)
  2. Rosenberg M, 1979, Conceiving the Self
  3. Nehra R, 1987, Development of a scale for the assessment of social support: initial try‐out in Indian setting, Ind J Soc Psychiatry, 4, 353
  4. American Psychiatric Association., 1994, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
  5. Lieberman M, 1985, Handbook of Stress, 764

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 117

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Johnson, L., Lundström, O., Åberg‐Wistedt, A., & Mathé, A. A.
Affiliations
Karolinska Institutet (SE)
Corresponding author
Johnson, Lars
ORCID
Venue
Bipolar Disorders
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-04
Volume
5
Issue
2
Pages
129-137
ISSN
  • 1398-5647 (ISSN-L)
  • 1399-5618
DOI
10.1034/j.1399-5618.2003.00021.x
OpenAlex
W2035280728
Cited by
117
References
31
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor, 6 d)
Locations
  • Bipolar Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
bipolar disorder, social support, remission, relapse, perceived social support, relapse risk
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Bipolar Disorder, Demography, Diagnosis, Differential, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Mental Health Services, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Recurrence, Remission Induction, Social Support, Time Factors, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review