Cited by 33Iron Metabolism and DisordersMaternal and Neonatal HealthcareMaternal and Perinatal Health Interventions

Iron supplementation during pregnancy in Sweden: to what extent is the national recommendation followed?

Open access
Wulff, Marianne, Ekström, Eva‐Charlotte·2003·Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica

Abstract

Background. While there has been a worldwide trend to reduce the recommended amount of iron in prenatal supplements, this has still not been implemented in Sweden. It is likely that the current national recommendation of 100 mg of iron/day to all pregnant women provides a larger amount of iron than warranted and results in increased occurrence of side‐effects and reduced compliance. This may also reduce midwives' motivation to implement the recommendation. The aim of this study was to assess adherence to the current recommendation and to describe factors associated with prescription and use of iron supplements. Methods. A questionnaire capturing determinants for and use of prenatal iron supplementation was distributed to newly delivered women and midwives in five regions of Sweden. In addition, an inquiry about implementation of the recommendation was sent to all senior obstetricians in charge of antenatal care. Results. Most (79%) of the senior obstetricians indicated adherence to the national recommendation. A lower percentage of midwives (41%) and a further lower proportion of pregnant women (28%) did so. Despite limited compliance to the recommendation, the majority of pregnant women had used some type of iron‐containing supplement. Side‐effects of supplements, perceived need and advice from midwives influenced their use. Many midwives preferred and practiced a selective supplementation strategy. Conclusions. The current recommendation is not practiced. Side‐effects and perceptions that the amount of iron is larger than necessary contribute to its limited use. A revision is needed to address the amount of iron required and strategies to ensure good adherence.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1034/j.1600-0412.2003.00186.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wulff, M., & Ekström, E.
Affiliations
  • Umeå University (SE)
  • Uppsala University (SE)
Venue
Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-06-06
Volume
82
Issue
7
Pages
628-635
ISSN
  • 0001-6349 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0412
OpenAlex
W2129013629
Cited by
33
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Lunds Universitet
  • Malmö Högskola
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Iron Metabolism and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Keywords
iron supplementation in pregnancy, guideline adherence, midwives, obstetricians, pregnant women, supplement side effects, medication adherence, prenatal care, Sweden
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Midwifery, Obstetrics, Patient Compliance, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Pregnancy, Prenatal Care, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sweden, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Nutrition Policy, Iron, Dietary, Dietary Supplements, Guideline Adherence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review